Search Results

0 results for 'Discovery'

You can use to get even better search results
Canal@Camp Apartments LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co.
Publication Date: 2024-04-30
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge John G. Koeltl
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 24-cv-2413

Court Grants Motion to Remand to NY State Court in Action Over Louisiana Property Damage

April 29, 2024 | Legaltech News

A WA Court's Ban of AI-Enhanced Video Evidence Raises Decade-Old Reliability Issues

The Washington state ruling highlights the problems AI-enhanced video may face in court, especially on the heels of recent Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments emphasizing evidence reliability.
8 minute read
April 29, 2024 | Legaltech News

FTC Accuses Amazon Execs of Auto-Deleting Signal Messages Long After Antitrust Probe Began

"It is highly likely that relevant information has been destroyed as a result of Amazon's actions and inactions," the Federal Trade Commission said in a filing last week.
7 minute read
April 29, 2024 | Corporate Counsel

FTC Says Amazon Execs Used Messaging App's Auto-Delete, Even as Antitrust Probe Unfolded

"It is highly likely that relevant information has been destroyed as a result of Amazon's actions and inactions," the Federal Trade Commission said in a filing last week.
7 minute read
April 29, 2024 | The Legal Intelligencer

Blurred Lines: The Ongoing Battle Between iLottery and iGaming

The fight is over legislation that prohibits the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (the department), the administrator of the lottery, from offering products that "simulate casino-style lottery games" as part of the iLottery program. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently construed the meaning of that phrase in Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment v. Department of Revenue.
9 minute read
April 29, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Former Warner Brothers Employee Files Employment Discrimination, Wrongful Termination Complaint

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just-filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be among the first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.
4 minute read
April 29, 2024 | New York Law Journal

'AI Sat Down at the Table and Began To Negotiate the Deal': The Emerging World of AI Agents

If you are wondering what the next big thing in AI is, it's AI agents. No doubt about it. Their capabilities are exciting, a little scary and essentially unknown. For legal practitioners, the issues that AI agents raise are complex.
6 minute read
April 29, 2024 | Legaltech News

The State of Information Governance and the Disconnect Between Policy and Reality

Law firms are playing a game of catch up as the sheer volume of data, both in hard copy and electronic form, they routinely handle continues to skyrocket…
6 minute read
Hall v. Hudson
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Orange
Judge: Justice Elena Goldberg-Velazquez
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: EF006880/2023

Issues of Fact About Use of Brakes, Speed of Car; Court Denies Summary Judgment

Int'l Constr. Prod., LLC v. Caterpillar Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: E-Commerce | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Matthew D. Stachel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Wilmington, DE; William A. Isaacson, Amy J. Mauser, David E. Cole, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff.
For defendant: David J. Baldwin, Peter C. McGivney, Berger Harris, Wilmington, DE; Joseph A. Ostoyich, Danielle Morello, Clifford Chance LLP, Washington, D.C.; Paul C. Cuomo, Heather Souder Choi, Adam Dec, Baker Botts LLP, Washington, D.C. for defendants.
Case number: 15-108-RGA

Sherman Act violation claim failed under the rule of reason where plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to define the relevant geographic or product market, but removal of plaintiff's products from a website, which hampered its ability to compete, was sufficient evidence of refusal to deal.

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now