Search Results

0 results for 'Discovery'

You can use to get even better search results
May 03, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Practical Prescriptions for Incident Response and Preparedness in Health Care

This article provides an overview of the health care sector's growing cybersecurity risks, best practices for helping prevent or mitigate cyberattacks and best practices for responding to incidents and mitigating health care organizations' risk of enforcement actions and litigation.
8 minute read
May 03, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Jury Trials in Surrogate's Court

Every Surrogate's Court case is a special proceeding for which there is a presumption that no right to a jury trial exists. There is, however, a limited subset of a cases in which a Surrogate's Court proceeding may be tried to a jury.
9 minute read
May 03, 2024 | Legaltech News

E-Discovery Startup Fileread Hires Former AstraZeneca Head of Legal Services Josh Kreamer as GC

The hire comes less than a year after Fileread closed on a $6 million funding round led by an investment firm backed by Google.
2 minute read
Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd. v. Dr. Reddy's Labs., Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Contracts | Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: A-2361-22

Plaintiffs appealed a discovery order requiring them to turn over documents to defendants that plaintiffs characterized as "competitively sensitive trade secrets." Plaintiffs argued that the information was irrelevant to the claims and defenses in the case and would not lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Windish v. 3M Co.
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Beetlestone
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 23-1531

Defendant 3M company's motion for sanctions against plaintiff in wrongful termination suit was granted and plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with prejudice.

Law Journal Press | Digital Book New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014 Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III View this Book

View more book results for the query "Discovery"

U.S. v. Gerace
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, U.S. - WDNY
Judge: District Judge Lawrence J. Vilardo
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19-CR-227

Attorney Not Disqualified; Placement of Names on Witness List Not Obstruction of Justice

Appellate Division, Second Department: May 3, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:May 1, 2024

D'Agostino v. Domino's Pizza
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for New Jersey
Judge: District Judge Sheridan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 3:17-cv-11603 (PGS)(TJB)

Steven D'Agostino sought reconsideration of the court's order, which denied his appeal of discovery orders in an action related to his employment at J&J Pizza, Inc., a franchisee of Domino's Pizza, Inc.

People v. Cruz
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Criminal Court, Bronx
Judge: Judge Yadhira Gonzalez-Taylor
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For the People by: ADA Garrett Tracey, Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx County.
For defendant: For the Defendant by: Rachna Agarwal, Esq., The Bronx Defenders.
Case number: CR-019417-22BX

Factual Allegations Allow Court to Reasonably Infer Defendant Drove Car Improperly

Italian Sons & Daughters of Am. v. City of Pittsburgh
Publication Date: 2024-05-03
Practice Area: Government
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge McCullough
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1124 C.D. 2022

Trial court erred in dismissing complaint challenging city's removal of statue from public park without first considering whether city's decision violated applicable laws or regulations. Orders of the trial court affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now