Search Results

0 results for 'DISH Network Corporation'

You can use to get even better search results
Talana Orzechowski v. The Boeing Company Non-Union Long-Term Disability Plan, Plan Number 625
Publication Date: 2017-05-11
Practice Area:
Industry: Insurance | Transportation
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges, and Donald E. Walter,* District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Russell George Petti (argued), Los Offices of Russell G. Petti, La Canada, California; Glenn R. Kantor and Peter S. Sessions, Kantor & Kantor LLP, Northridge, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Ronald Keith Alberts, Matthew G. Kleiner, Jessica Wolff, Michelle L. Steinhardt, and Adelle Greenfield, Gordon & Rees LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: No. 14-55919

De novo review applied to employer disability plan's denial of benefits (Bybee, J.)

In Re: Lehman Brothers Holdings, Debtor.
Publication Date: 2017-05-09
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Jacobs, Sack, and Carney, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For the Claimant-Appellants Jennifer Adler, Ian Anderson, Jennifer Becker, Craig Benson, Paola Biraschi, Karen Brewer, William Broadbent, David Brooks, Guillemette Callies, Patrick Cremin, Michael Collier, Joseph D'Amadeo, John Dmuchowski, Nestor De Jesus, Steven Engel, Louise Goldberg, Michael Gran, Anshuman Goyal, Adrian Graves, Sandra Hahn-Colbert, Gregg Hawes, Nicholas Howard, Julian Iragorri, Harriet Chan King, Karen Krieger, Tal Lev Ari, Yeruchim Levilev, Sarah Lewis, Patricia Luken, Lawrence McCarthy, Michael McCully, Paul Shotton, Steven Schwab, Colin S.A. Welch, Pierluigi Volini, Ian Neville, Sandy Fleischman Richman, Jeffrey Wecker, Norman Siegel, Thomas O'Sullivan, Peter Ward, Timothy Wilkinson, Milan Veleba, Andrea Sullivan, Hugh McGee, Judith Winchester, Ross Shapiro, Stephen Snelling, Brian Seward, Margaret Smith, Alvaro Santodomingo, Helmut Olivier, Estate of Michael Mullen, Jack Rivkin, Barry Porter, Gregg Somma, Christiane Schuster, Michael Petrucelli, Martin Patterson, Fabio Liotti, and Mary Langevin: Andrew R. Goldenberg, on the briefs, Richard J. Schager, Jr., Stamell & Schager, LLP, New York, NY. For the Claimants-Appellants Madelyn Antoncic, Michele Bareggi, Riccardo Banchetti, Timothy A. Burke, Nachiketa Das, Philippe Dufournier, Brian Gross, Peter Hornick, Andrea Jao, Michael Lawsky, Alexandre Catalao Maia, Nikki Marshall, Richard Noble, Anke Parr, Vincent Primiano, Giancarlo Saronne, Johathan Sebiri, Charles Spero, Harshad Shah, Gordon Sweely, Rocco F. Andriola, Amit K. Sarkar, Darian J. Cohen, Lars P. Jacobson, Christian E. Stevens, and Andrew Wideman: Lisa M. Solomon, Law Offices of Lisa M. Solomon, New York, NY. For the Claimants-Appellants Marvin C. Schwartz, Stephanie Stiefel, Richard J. Glasebrook, II, Judith Ann Kenney, Richard Nackerson, Henry Ramallo, Christian Reynolds, David I. Weiner, Richard Levine, and Seth Finkel: Eugene Neal Kaplan, Kaplan Landau, LLP, New York, NY, on the briefs, Deborah E. Lans, Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Debtor-Appellee Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.: Ralph I. Miller, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 16-1296-bk

Vested Stock Compensation Considered Securities in Lehman Bankruptc

May 03, 2017 |

Device Developers Spar Over 'Siri' Digital Assistant Patents

Acer Inc. and ASUS Computer International on Tuesday took different tacks in responding to allegations that their smartphones and tablets had infringed on patents that underpin Siri.
8 minute read
May 03, 2017 | Delaware Law Weekly

Device Developers Spar Over 'Siri' Digital Assistant Patents

Acer Inc. and ASUS Computer International on Tuesday took different tacks in responding to allegations that their smartphones and tablets had infringed on patents that underpin Siri.
8 minute read
April 17, 2017 |

Florida Supreme Court Sides With State in TV Tax Fight

The Florida Supreme Court upheld a law that set different tax rates for cable and satellite television services, overturning a lower-court ruling that could have had major financial ramifications for the state.
5 minute read
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai v. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., 15 Civ. 9414
Publication Date: 2017-03-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Robert Sweet
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff by: Chieme Suzuki, Esq., Honor Costello, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, New York, NY. By: Gregory Call, Esq., Mark T. Jansen, Esq., Pilar R. Stillwater, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, San Francisco, CA.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant by: Benjamin Naftalis, Esq., Daniel G. Brown, Esq., Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY. By: Jake Ryan, Esq., Stephanie N. Grace, Esq., Latham & Watkins, San Diego, CA. By: Michael A. Morin, Esq., Latham & Watkins, Washington, DC.
Case number: 15 Civ. 9414

Medical School Cannot Seek Royalties for Drug's Sale, Can Only Seek Damages at 2010

February 27, 2017 |

Where There's Smoke: N.Y. Companies Should Re-examine Marijuana Policies

Kathryn Barcroft, special counsel for Cohen & Gresser, writes: With the growing trend toward legalization of marijuana for both medical and recreational purposes, New York companies should carefully evaluate their workplace policies to adhere to the latest legal developments impacting employees.
20 minute read
February 09, 2017 |

Employment Law Issues in Pennsylvania's Medical Marijuana Act

Act 16 of 2016, the Medical Marijuana Act (MMA), 35 Pa.C.S.A. §10231.101, et seq., effective May 17, 2016, puts Pennsylvania among the growing number of states permitting the use of marijuana for prescribed medicinal purposes. The MMA, like all state laws purporting to "legalize" marijuana use, squarely conflicts with federal law, which still considers marijuana to be a Schedule 1 substance under the Controlled Substances Act with no legitimate medical uses, see 21 U.S.C. Sections 812(b)(1)(A)-(C); 844(a).
14 minute read
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Giganews, Inc.
Publication Date: 2017-01-23
Practice Area:
Industry: E–commerce
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Before: Harry Pregerson, Dorothy W. Nelson, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David N. Schultz (argued), Law Offices of David N. Schultz, Los Angeles, California; Eric J. Benink, Krause Kalfayan Benink & Slavens LLP, San Diego, California; for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee and Third Party-Appellee.
For defendant: Andrew Phillip Bridges (argued), Jedediah Wakefield, Joseph S. Belichick, and Todd R. Gregorian, Fenwick & West LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Case number: No. 15-55500 No. 15-55523 No. 15-56026

Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 622 PERFECT 10, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GIGANEWS, INC.; LI

January 11, 2017 |

Mandatory Arbitration Agreements: To Be or Not to Be

A. Michael Weber discusses steps employers can take in drafting mandatory arbitration policies to help protect against challenges to their enforceability.
25 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now