0 results for 'DISH Network Corporation'
In the Matter of Echostar Satellite Corporation, Petitioner v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New York et al., Respondents, 508200
Publication Date: 2010-12-16 Practice Area: Taxation
Industry: Court: Appellate Division, Third Department Judge: Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Rose, Malone Jr. and Egan Jr., JJ. Attorneys: For plaintiff: Morrison & Foerster, L.L.P., New York City (Paul H. Frankel of counsel), for Petitioner. For defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Andrew D. Bing of counsel), for Commissioner of Taxation and Finance, Respondent. Case number: 508200
Cite as: Matter of Echostar v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of The State of New York et al, 508200, NYLJ 1202476186324, at *1 (App. Div., 3rd, Decided December 9, 2010)
TKR Cable Co. v. Cable City Corp.
Publication Date: 2001-10-02 Practice Area: cable/telecom
Industry: Court: 3rd Cir. Judge: Fuentes, Circuit Judge. Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 98-5341
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey District Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr.Argued April 17, 2001Opinion Filed: October 1, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTTK
Pepper Hamilton Dodges Google Disqualification Bid in Digitude Patent War
Publication Date: 2012-02-14 Practice Area: Industry: Court: Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number:
Like other firms, Pepper advises clients on both ends of the IP spectrum: prosecuting patent applications for tech companies on the one hand, and representing non-practicing entities on the other. That became a problem for Google, however, when Pepper filed infringement suits against Google's Android partners on behalf of a patent aggregator called Digitude Innovations.
NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina, 12-105(L)
Publication Date: 2013-08-27 Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Judge: Before: Pooler, B.D. Parker, and Raggi, C.JJ. Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee: NML Capital, Ltd., Matthew D. McGill, Jason J. Mendro, on the brief, Theodore B. Olson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert A. Cohen, Eric C. Kirsch, Dechert LLP, New York, N.Y. For Plaintiff-Appellee: Olifant Fund, Ltd., Leonard F. Lesser, Simon Lesser, P.C., New York, N.Y. For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Pablo Alberto Varela, et al., Michael C. Spencer, Milberg LLP, New York, N.Y. For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd., ACP Master, Ltd., Blue Angel Capital I LLC, and Aurelius Opportunities Master Fund II, LLC., Edward A. Friedman, Daniel B. Rapport, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, N.Y. Roy T. Englert, Jr., Mark T. Stancil, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Washington, D.C. For defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: The Republic of Argentina., Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Ezequiel Sanchez-Herrera, Sara A. Sanchez, Michael M. Brennan, on the brief, Jonathan I. Blackman, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, N.Y. For Non-Party Appellant: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee., Colin E. Wrabley, on the brief, James C. Martin, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburg, Penn.; Eric A Schaffer, Reed Smith LLP, New York, N.Y. For Non-Party Appellants: The Exchange Bondholder Group., David A. Barrett, Nicholas A. Gravante, Jr., Steven I. Froot, on the brief, David Boies, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, New York, N.Y. Sean F. O'Shea, Michael E. Petrella, Daniel M. Hibshoosh, O'Shea Partners LLP, New York, N.Y. For Non-Party Appellant: Fintech Advisory Inc., William F. Dahill, Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP, New York, N.Y. For Intervenors: Euro Bondholders., Christopher J. Clark, Craig A. Batchelor, Michael E. Bern, Latham & Watkins, LLP, New York, N.Y. For Intervenor: ICE Canyon LLC., Bruce Bennett, James O. Johnston, Beong-Soo Kim, Jones Day, Los Angeles, Cal. Meir Feder, Jones Day, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae EM Ltd., in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: David W. Rivkin, Suzanne M. Grosso, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, N.Y. Amicus Curiae pro se, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Ronald Mann, Esq., New York, N.Y. For Amici Curiae Montreux Partners, L.P. and Wilton Capital, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Jack L. Goldsmith III, Cambridge, Mass.; Judd B. Grossman, Grossman LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae the Washington Legal Foundation, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Richard A. Samp, Cory L. Andrews, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, D.C. For Amicus Curiae Prof. Kenneth W. Dam, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Kevin S. Reed, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, N.Y. For Duane Morris Individual Plaintiffs — Appellees: Anthony J. Costantini, Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr., Suzan Jo, Mary C. Pennisi, Duane Morris LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae The Clearing House Association L.L.C., in support of Defendant — Appellant: Paul Saltzman, Joseph R. Alexander, The Clearing House Association L.L.C., New York, N.Y.; H. Rodgin Cohen, Michael M. Wiseman, Sergio J. Galvis, Joseph E. Neuhaus, Michael J. Ushkow, Jared P. Roscoe, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae Alfonso Prat-Gay, in support of Defendant-Appellant: Eugenio A. Bruno, Estudio Garrido, Buenos Aires, Argentina; M. Darren Traub, Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae Prof. Anne Krueger, in support of Defendant-Appellant: Edward Scarvalone, Doar Rieck Kaley & Mack, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae Euroclear Bank SA/NV, in support of Defendant-Appellant: Paul T. Shoemaker, Greenfield Stein & Senior LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae Puente Hnos. Sociedad de Bolsa S.A., in support of Defendant-Appellant: Marco E. Schnabl, Timothy G. Nelson, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae the American Bankers Association, in support of Non-Party Appellant The Bank of New York Mellon., Matthew D. Ingber, Chrisopher J. Houpt, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, N.Y.; Charles A. Rothfeld, Paul W. Hughes, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, D.C. Case number: 12-105(L)
Cite as: NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina, 12-105(L), NYLJ 1202616997114, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 23, 2013) 12-105(L) Before:
Irell Strikes Again for TiVo with Motorola Deal
Publication Date: 2013-06-06 Practice Area: Industry: Court: Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number:
TiVo and its lawyers at Irell & Manella and McKool Smith have secured yet another settlement in their patent litigation campaign against the digital television industry. The latest TiVo foe to cut a deal is Google's Motorola Mobility unit, which faced a jury trial next week in East Texas.
Teltech Systems Inc. v. Bryant
Publication Date: 2012-12-13 Practice Area: Communications
Industry: Court: 5th Cir. Judge: Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale, Circuit Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 12-60027
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Before KING, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. Defendants-Appellants Phil Bryant, Governor of Mississ
TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
Resources
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now