Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Columbia University'

You can use to get even better search results
October 18, 2000 |

Insider Trading Rules About to Change

Starting Oct. 23, a little-noticed Securities and Exchange Commission rule will permit employees to legally trade their company's shares even if they are aware of material inside information. The catch: Trades must be made under a written plan created before the insider knew of the stock-sensitive development. The rule could be a boon for corporate executives and employees of smaller companies.
6 minute read
August 17, 2001 |

DOJ Clears Way for 3D's DTM Buy

The Department of Justice dropped an antitrust challenge to 3D Systems Corp.'s $45 million acquisition of DTM Corp. after the companies agreed to license technologies used to create three-dimensional computer designs. The settlement is the latest example of the government's intolerance for "three-to-two" mergers, where two of the three competitors in a given market decide to combine.
3 minute read
February 21, 2006 |

Alito's First Day on High Court a Busy One

New Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr.'s first day on the bench Tuesday was an unusually busy one. The Court heard arguments in key environmental cases, issued a ruling involving freedom of religion, and granted review in a new case that will put the justices back in the center of the national abortion rights debate.
5 minute read
February 06, 2002 |

Top Defense Verdicts

A look at the top defense verdicts of the year 2001, from environmental contamination to products liability.
55 minute read
United States of America v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 05 Civ. 5393 (RPP)
Publication Date: 2011-04-11
Practice Area: Legal Profession
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Robert P. Patterson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Charles P. Greenman, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York, NY. Eric L. Unis, Troutman Sanders LLP (NYC), New York, NY. Philip Roy Michael, Michael Law Group, New York NY.
For defendant: Counsel for Defendants: Richard D. Raskin, Sidley Austin, LLP (Chicago), Chicago, IL. Scott David Stein, Sidley Austin, LLP (Chicago), Chicago, IL. Kevin Michael McGinty, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, PC, Boston, MA.
Case number: 05 Civ. 5393 (RPP)

Cite as: United States of America v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 05 Civ. 5393 (RPP), NYLJ 1202489464719, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 24, 2011)District Judge

Law Journal Press | Digital Book District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024 Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair View this Book

View more book results for the query "Columbia University"

June 25, 2002 |

What's New in the Workplace?

The Recorder recently invited a group of San Francisco Bay Area labor and employment practitioners to discuss various issues of concern to attorneys who represent employers and employees. The discussion focused on disability rights law cases and the impact of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions involving the Americans with Disabilities Act.
45 minute read
November 14, 2001 |

Brief for Respondents in 'Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Norman Mineta, Secretary of Transportation'

Before the U.S. Supreme Court on writ of certiorari, Respondents argue: 1) the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals correctly applied the strict scrutiny standard in determining whether Congress had a compelling interest to enact legislation designed to remedy the effects of racial discrimination; and 2) the Department of Transportation's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program is constitutional.
73 minute read
August 29, 2005 |

Taking Stock of 'Grokster'

The Internet industry has had some time to sit back and examine the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studio v. Grokster, pondering its true meaning and its impact on technology and software developers as well as the entertainment field. In this roundtable discussion, members of Internet Law & Strategy's Board of Editors and other Internet law experts add their own perspectives on the implications of Grokster.
28 minute read
IMS Health Inc. v. Sorrell, 09-1913-cv (L), 09-2056-cv (CON)
Publication Date: 2010-12-03
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Feinberg and Livingston, C.JJ., and Koeltl, D.J.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Thomas R. Julin, Jamie Z. Isani, Patricia Acosta, Hunton & Williams LLP, Miami, FL; Robert B. Hemley, Matthew B. Byrne, Gravel & Shea, P.A, Burlington, VT; Thomas C. Goldstein, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants IMS Health Inc. and Source Healthcare Analytics, Inc.. Mark A. Ash, Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP, Raleigh, NC, for Plaintiff-Appellant Verispan LLC. Robert N. Weiner, Jeffrey L. Handwerker, Sarah Brackney Arni, Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC; Karen McAndrew, Linda J. Cohen, Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew, P.C., Burlington, VT, for Plaintiff-Appellant Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America.
For defendant: William H. Sorrell, Attorney General of the State of Vermont; Bridget C. Asay, Assistant Attorney General; Sarah E.B. London, Kate G. Duffy, David R. Cassetty, Assistants Attorneys General, on the brief, Montpelier, VT, for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: 09-1913-cv (L), 09-2056-cv (CON)

Cite as: IMS Health Inc. v. Sorrell, 09-1913-cv (L), 09-2056-cv (CON), NYLJ 1202475625582, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 23, 2010)Before: Feinberg and Living

August 04, 2000 |

And Now, the Rest of Clinton's Clemency Story

On July 7, President Clinton commuted the sentences of five federal prisoners, four of whom were women. "The president felt they had served a disproportionate amount of time," a White House spokesman said. "They received much more severe sentences than their husbands and boyfriends." But a close look at the president's commutation poster children shows the spin about their release is an oversimplification.
15 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources