Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Clark Hill'

You can use to get even better search results
February 27, 2006 |

Alphabetical Names for State Case Digests

Alphabetical listing of case digests.
8 minute read
Aguilar v. NYCTA, 103132/06
Publication Date: 2011-02-18
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Tom, J.P., DeGrasse, Freedman, Román, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom & Rubinowitz, New York (Ben B. Rubinowitz of counsel), for respondents.
For defendant: Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellants.
Case number: 103132/06

Cite as: Aguilar v. NYCTA, 103132/06, NYLJ 1202482396588, at *1 (App. Div., 1st, Decided February 17, 2011)Before: Tom, J.P., DeGrasse, Freedman, Rom&aacute

July 09, 2013 |

Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 22, No. 131 – July 9, 2013

Daily decision alert.
15 minute read
April 19, 2006 |

Ford: Teamwork Is Job 1

16 minute read
January 04, 2007 |

Paul Clement stays cool in High Court hot seat

IN THE PANTHEON of lawyers who have been blind-sided by their clients, it will be hard to top what happened to Paul Clement on April 28, 2004. Clement, then deputy solicitor general, was arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court that Congress, in its post-9/11 authorization of military force, had also in effect given the green light to the military detention of Jose Padilla, a U.
18 minute read
March 19, 2003 |

Cadbury Schweppes / Adams Confectionery

4 minute read
June 25, 2009 |

Injury During Exam Ruled Malpractice, Not Simple Negligence

Doctors who injure patients during the independent medical examinations required for plaintiffs in personal injury cases are subject to medical malpractice claims, not actions for ordinary negligence, a widely divided state Court of Appeals ruled yesterday. The majority of the 4-3 Court held that a "limited physician-patient relationship" exists during such examinations, typically performed at the behest of insurers to determine the extent of injuries plaintiffs suffered in prior accidents. The the 2 1/2-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice should apply to any claims brought against doctors for harm done during the exams, the majority said.
7 minute read
November 11, 2002 |

Suits & Deals

8 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources