Search Results

0 results for 'Chilivis Cochran Larkins Bever'

You can use to get even better search results
Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Gaither
Publication Date: 2007-07-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Ruffin, John H.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Randall J. Butterfield King & Spalding, Jennifer G. Cooper Gambrell & Stolz LLP, Anthony L. Cochran Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Atlanta, C. Wilson DuBose Winkler & DuBose, Madison, and Mary Parsons Fulkerson, Feder & Wollam LLP, Houston,Texas, for appellant.
For defendant: . John D. Steel Matthews & Steel, Atlanta, Brian H. Barr Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Echsner & Proctor PA, Pensacola, Fla., Grant Kaiser The Kaiser Firm, John E. Williams Jr. Williams Baily Law Firm, Houston, Texas, and Walter Umphrey Provost Umphrey Law Firm, Beaumont, Texas, for appellees. Other party representation: James L. Hollis Balch & Bingham LLP, Charles B. Marsh, Kenneth M. Barre Swift, Currie, McGhee & Heirs, John M. Hawkins Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, Robert B. Hocutt Nall & Miller, Robert C. Buck Childers, Buck & Schlueter LLP, Stevan A. Miller Drew Eckl & Farnham LLP, Charles J. Cole Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney LLP, Andrew M. Gibson Alston & Bird, Atlanta, C. Ronald Ellington, Athens, and Mikal Watts The Watts Law Firm LLP, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Case number: A07A0177

The claims of over 350 plaintiffs in ten law suits against defendant electric companies' for their alleged injures as the result of exposure to welding fumes were improperly joined under O.C.G.A. §

Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Gaither
Publication Date: 2007-07-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Ruffin, John H.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Randall J. Butterfield King & Spalding, Jennifer G. Cooper Gambrell & Stolz LLP, Anthony L. Cochran Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Atlanta, C. Wilson DuBose Winkler & DuBose, Madison, and Mary Parsons Fulkerson, Feder & Wollam LLP, Houston, Texas, for appellant.
For defendant: . John D. Steel Matthews & Steel, Atlanta, Brian H. Barr Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Echsner & Proctor PA, Pensacola, Fla., Grant Kaiser The Kaiser Firm, John E. Williams Jr. Williams Baily Law Firm, Houston, Texas, and Walter Umphrey Provost Umphrey Law Firm, Beaumont, Texas, for appellees. Other party representation: James L. Hollis Balch & Bingham LLP, Charles B. Marsh, Kenneth M. Barre Swift, Currie, McGhee & Heirs, John M. Hawkins Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, Robert B. Hocutt Nall & Miller, Robert C. Buck Childers, Buck & Schlueter LLP, Stevan A. Miller Drew Eckl & Farnham LLP, Charles J. Cole Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney LLP, Andrew M. Gibson Alston & Bird, Atlanta, C. Ronald Ellington, Athens, and Mikal Watts The Watts Law Firm LLP, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Case number: A07A0177

The claims of over 350 plaintiffs in ten law suits against defendant electric companies' for their alleged injures as the result of exposure to welding fumes were improperly joined under O.C.G.A. §

King v. Brock
Publication Date: 2007-06-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Thompson, Hugh P.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John G. Parker, William K. Whitner, Nathan L. Coppernoll Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, Atlanta, and Roy E. Barnes The Barnes Law Group LLC, Marietta, for appellant.
For defendant: . Taylor W. Jones, Jenny E. Jensen, Richard E. Harris Jones, Jensen & Harris, John K. Larkins Jr. and David M. Stewart Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: S06G1657

An award of nominal damages in a contract action is sufficient to confer prevailing party status under a contractual fee-shifting prov

Toberman v. Larose Ltd. Partnership
Publication Date: 2006-10-20
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Bernes, Debra
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Timothy H. Kratz McGuire Woods LLP, Robert J. Waddell Alston & Bird LLP, and Robert L. Florence Troutman Sanders LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Anthony L. Cochran Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Atlanta, Greg Shinall and Paul E. Slater Sperling & Slater, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Case number: A06A1133

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant's motion for a TRO enjoining the appellees from taking certain actions with regard to appellant's farm, wine collection and pers

Kace Invs. LP v. Hull
Publication Date: 2006-03-24
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Doyle, John J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William A. Trotter III, Warren D. Evans William A. Trotter III PC, William J. Williams Johnston, Wilkin & Williams, Augusta, John K. Larkins Jr. and Thomas D. Bever Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: John B. Long and A. Montague Miller Tucker, Everitt, Long, Brewton & Lanier PA, Augusta, for appellees. Other party representation: Robert C. Hagler, James W. Purcell Fulcher, Hagler, Reed, Hanks & Harper, and William M. Fleming, Augusta.
Case number: A05A2014

The defendants were entitled to amend their counterclaim, since claims remained pending after the remittitur was returned to the trial court following an appeal on cross motions for summary judgment

In re Howard
Publication Date: 2005-01-21
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John K. Larkins Jr. Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever LLP, Atlanta. William P. Smith III, General Counsel, and K. Gene Chapman State Bar of Georgia, Atlanta. C. Bradford Marsh, Chairperson Review Panel, Atlanta.
For defendant:
Case number: S04Y1172

An attorney who pled guilty in federal court to filing a false tax declaration voluntarily surrendered his li

Head v. Wachovia Bank N.A.
Publication Date: 2003-12-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William L. Bost Jr. Greenfield, Bost & Kliros PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Ralph R. Morrison and Gregory R. Hanthorn Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Atlanta, for appellees. Other party representation: Charles D. Hurt Jr., Nikola R. Djuric Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Wayne R. Vason Troutman Sanders, Russell D. Waldon Harper, Waldon & Craig, Nickolas P. Chilivis Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, F. T. Davis Jr. Long, Aldridge & Norman, William M. Ellard Cushing, Morris, Arbruster & Jones, and James R. Kanner Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, Atlanta.
Case number: A03A1568

A trust beneficiary presented no grounds for setting aside an order enforcing a consent agreement between the trust and its 53 benefici

Patton v. St. Francis Hosp.
Publication Date: 2003-03-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Doyle, John J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Anthony L. Cochran Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Alan F. Herman, Assunta F. Deevey Hawkins & Parnell LLP, Kimberly L. Woodland and Robert P. Monyak Love & Willingham, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case number: A03A0148

A hospital's decision to terminate a doctor's staff privileges was based on the hospital's reasonable belief that the denial furthered quality health

Cox v. Barber
Publication Date: 2002-08-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, and Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Nickolas P. Chilivis, John K. Larkins Jr. Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever LLP, Charles S. Baker and Harold S. Gulliver, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: S02A1818

The 1-year residency requirement for Georgia Public Service Commission candidates is constitut

Georgia Baptist Health Care Sys. Inc. v. Hanafi
Publication Date: 2002-02-22
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Doyle, John J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Timothy A. Baxter, Andrew B. Flake and Kevin B. Getzendanner Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: . Michael Weinstock, Louis R. Cohan, Jami M. Kohn Weinstock & Scavo PC, and Ruth H. Gershon Jones, Davis, Reavis & Pogue, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A01A2028

Plaintiff waited 17 months after learning of defense counsel's potential conflict of interest before filing a motion to disqualify and did not file that motion until after the trial court issued an

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now