0 results for 'Charles Schwab & Co.'
People of the State of New York v. Amazon.com Inc.
Publication Date: 2021-08-02 Practice Area: Civil Procedure |
Covid-19
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY Judge: District Judge Jed Rakoff Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 21-CV-1417
NYAG's Suit Against Amazon Remanded; Claims Not Preempted by OSHA, NLRA
Appellate Division, Second Department: July 7, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-07-09 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department: July 7, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department: July 1, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-07-06 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, First Department: July 1, 2021
Giannetta v. Johnson
Publication Date: 2021-06-30 Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY Judge: District Judge Paul Engelmayer Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 20 Civ. 9016
Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Pageant Executive; Former Contestant's Libel Suit Dismissed
U.S. v. Greebel
Publication Date: 2021-04-22 Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights |
Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY Judge: District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 15 Cr. 637
Writs Garnishing Attorney's Retirement Accounts Not Excepted From Restitution Are Affirmed
Brackeen v. Haaland
Publication Date: 2021-04-19 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Civil Rights |
Native American Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judge: Per Curiam Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 18-11479
A divided Fifth Circuit, which reconsidered nearly a dozen constitutional issues related to the Indian Child Welfare Act, could only set precedent for a few issues.
SLUSA's 'In Connection With' Requirement
In his Corporate Litigation column, Joseph McLaughlin discusses the recent Ninth Circuit decision in 'Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co.,' which reversed a SLUSA dismissal of state law fiduciary claims last month, illustrating that particularly in fee-related cases the line between federal securities law claims and state law claims remains inexact.
Appellate Division, Second Department: March 31, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-04-02 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department: March 31, 2021
Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC v. Bank of America Corp.
Publication Date: 2021-03-25 Practice Area: Civil Procedure |
White Collar Crime
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Judge: Circuit Judge Richard Sullivan Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC and Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Ltd.: Vincent Briganti, Margaret MacLean, Lowey Dannenberg, P.C., White Plains, NY, on the brief, Eric F. Citron, Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Bethesda, MD.
For Defendants-Appellees Credit Suisse Group AG, Credit Suisse AG, and Credit Suisse International: Herbert S. Washer, Elai Katz, Jason M. Hall, Lauren Perlgut, Adam S. Mintz, on the brief, Joel Kurtzberg, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.: Arthur J. Burke, Paul S. Mishkin, Adam G. Mehes, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and ANZ Securities, Inc.: Penny Shane, Corey Omer, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., n/k/a MUFG Bank, Ltd.: Christopher M. Viapiano, Elizabeth A. Cassady, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Washington, DC.
For Defendants-Appellees Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC, and Barclays Capital Inc.: Jonathan D. Schiller, Christopher Emmanuel Duffy, Leigh M. Nathanson, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, NY. For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees BNP Paribas, S.A., BNP Paribas North America, Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., and BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage, Inc.: Jayant W. Tambe, Stephen J. Obie, Kelly A. Carrero, Jones Day, New York, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee Commerzbank AG: David R. Gelfand, Mark D. Villaverde, Milbank LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Crédit Agricole S.A.: Andrew Hammon, Kimberly Anne Havlin, White & Case LLP, New York, NY; Darryl S. Lew, White & Case LLP, Washington, DC.
For Defendants-Appellees DBS Bank Ltd., DBS Group Holdings Ltd., and DBS Vickers Securities (USA) Inc.: Erica S. Weisgerber, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee Deutsche Bank AG: Aidan Synnott, Hallie S. Goldblatt, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Macquarie Bank Ltd. and Macquarie Group Ltd.: Christopher M. Paparella, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendant-Appellee Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited: C. Fairley Spillman, Pratik A. Shah, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC.
For Defendants-Appellees The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, and RBS Securities Japan Limited: David S. Lesser, Jamie S. Dycus, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees Standard Chartered Bank and Standard Chartered plc: Marc J. Gottridge, Lisa J. Fried, Benjamin A. Fleming, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees United Overseas Bank Limited and UOB Global Capital, LLC: Dale C. Christensen, Jr., Noah Czarny, Seward & Kissel LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC Holdings plc, HSBC North America Holdings Inc., and HSBC USA Inc.: Nowell D. Bamberger, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Washington, DC; Charity E. Lee, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees UBS AG and UBS Securities Japan Co., Ltd.: Mark A. Kirsch, Eric J. Stock, Jefferson E. Bell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY.
For Defendants-Appellees ING Groep N.V., ING Bank N.V., and ING Capital Markets LLC.: Amanda F. Davidoff, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Washington, DC. Case number: 19-2719-cv
Real Party in Interest Had Article III Standing at All Times, Could Enter Entities' Shoes
Appellate Division, Second Department: March 10, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-03-12 Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity |
Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department: March 10, 2021
TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Andy Goldberg, Laner Muchin Managing Partner 1 minute read
Resources
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now