0 results for 'Cardinal Health'
Oklahoma Obtains $250M Settlement With Opioid Distributors
Monday's settlement comes after the Oklahoma Supreme Court reversed a $465 million judgment the state obtained against manufacturer Johnson & Johnson's Janssen Pharmaceuticals.Employers Should Reconsider Plans To Discharge Employees for Refusing the COVID-19 Vaccine
Because employers must seriously consider their employees' religious and medical accommodation requests on a case-by-case basis, more attention should be given to vaccine alternatives that will permit employees to do their jobs effectively without risking the safety of their coworkers or overburdening their employers.Break Out the Org Chart: How Covington Is Managing Its Opioid Docket for McKesson
Paul Schmidt, Andrew Stanner and Laura Flahive Wu of Covington & Burling discuss the challenge of staying on top of the all-encompassing assignment that's called on 50 lawyers at any given time.View more book results for the query "Cardinal Health"
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
After a two-week trial in Richmond, Virginia, a federal jury this week sided with Sullivan & Cromwell client Columbia University finding that NortonLifeLock Inc. infringed two cybersecurity patents developed by professors at Columbia's Intrusion Detection Systems Laboratory.Walgreens' $683 Million Opioid Settlement Halts Florida Trial
Thursday's settlement with Walgreens includes $63 million in litigation costs for the state and cities and counties that filed their own opioid lawsuits.Walgreens' $683 Million Opioid Settlement Halts Florida Trial
Another opioid trial began on April 25 in San Francisco against Walgreens, as well as manufacturers Allergan and Teva, and Teva's distribution subsidiary Anda.Washington Settles Opioid Case for $518 Million
Tuesday's announcement, from Attorney General Bob Ferguson, comes after the state wrapped up a bench trial against the distributors last month but before King County Superior Court Judge Michael Scott had ruled on the case.Cognitive Awareness as a Prerequisite for Damages Under PHL 2801-d
New York Public Health Law §2801-d provides a private cause of action for nursing home residents injured as a result of any deprivation of their rights that cause an injury. This article addresses the question of whether a PHL 2801-d claimant must demonstrate some level of cognitive awareness that he or she was deprived of the right as a prerequisite to recover noneconomic damages. The First and Third Departments of the Appellate Division split on this issue in decisions handed down in 2021. The First Department answered "yes," and the Third Department "no."Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now