Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Burger King'

You can use to get even better search results
Appellate Division, Second Department: November 4, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-11-04
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:November 2, 2022

October 25, 2022 | New York Law Journal

A Peek Behind Recent No Poach Antitrust Actions in Franchising

Recent decisions involving no-poach/no-hire agreements between franchisors and franchisees have created uncertainty as to whether these entities can be liable for Section 1 antitrust violations, and which legal standards apply in such cases, creating substantial risk for franchisors and franchisees alike.
7 minute read
Appellate Division, Second Department: October 25, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-10-25
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Motion & Order on Application released on:October 21, 2022

EMO Trans v. Inmobiliaria Axial
Publication Date: 2022-10-24
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure | Deals and Transactions
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Palafox
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 08-20-00200-CV

Appellee, Inmobiliaria Axial, is a Mexican corporation who has its headquarters in and owns a warehouse in Juarez, Mxico, which they leased to Empresa Mexicana Organizadora de Serviocos Logisticos S. de R.L. EMO Trans is a U.S. national cargo logistics company headquartered in New York that stored some of its customers' cargo in the space leased by Empresa.

October 21, 2022 | The Legal Intelligencer

Theme and Variations: Increased Efforts to Limit Restraints on Employee Mobility

Over the last few years, the Biden administration and legislatures in dozens of states have increasingly focused on efforts to preserve employee mobility, most notably by increasingly placing limits on the use of restrictive covenants and targeting as anticompetitive other measures like no-poach clauses between competitors.
9 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Maslanka’s Texas Field Guide to Employment Law 2019 Authors: Michael P. Maslanka View this Book

View more book results for the query "Burger King"

October 21, 2022 | New York Law Journal

See Who Passed the July 2022 New York Bar Exam

The New York State Board of Law Examiners examined 9,609 candidates, 6,350 of whom passed for an overall passing rate of 66%.
88 minute read
Appellate Division,Second Department: October 21, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-10-21
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:October 19, 2022

Winn v. Vitesco Technologies GMBH
Publication Date: 2022-10-20
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Products Liability
Industry: Automotive | Consumer Products | Manufacturing
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David Bessho, (Cozen and O’Connor), Atlanta, Maria Ermakova, (Cozen and O’Connor), New York, for appellant.
For defendant: Christopher Anulewicz, (Balch & Bingham LLP), Atlanta, Christopher Neill, (Fields Howell LLP), Atlanta, Douglas Horelick, Eric Ruben, (Clyde & Co US LLP), Miami, for appellee; Andrew Beal, Milinda Brown, (Buckley Beal LLP), Atlanta, for other party.
Case number: A22A0726

German Auto Parts Manufacturer Did Not Purposefully Avail Itself of Georgia Laws

Freeman v. The State
Publication Date: 2022-10-17
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Hodges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jennifer Arndt, (Assistant Public Defender), Covington, for appellant.
For defendant: Randal McGinley, (Newton County District Attorney’s Office), Covington, Briana Carter, Conyers, for appellee.
Case number: A22A0996

Court affirms convictions for aggravated battery and other crimes over defendant's challenges to sufficiency of evidence and admission of prior acts evidence

Sarr v. Sinergia Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-10-11
Practice Area: Employment Compliance | Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Valerie E. Caproni
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-CV-3610

Modified Collective Conditionally Certified in FLSA Pay Suit Over Travel Time, Meal Breaks

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now