0 results for 'BristolMyers Squibb'
7th Circ.: Applying 'Bristol-Myers' to Class Actions Would Be a 'Major Change in the Law'
"This change is not warranted by the Supreme Court's decision in Bristol-Myers," wrote the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, reversing dismissal of a class action based on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California. Wednesday's ruling comes one day after the D.C. Circuit dodged the same question in a similar case.7th Circuit.: Applying 'Bristol-Myers' to Class Actions Would Be a 'Major Change in the Law'
"This change is not warranted by the Supreme Court's decision in Bristol-Myers," wrote the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, reversing dismissal of a class action based on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California. Wednesday's ruling comes one day after the D.C. Circuit dodged the same question in a similar case.In TCPA Suit Against Pa. Company, 7th Circ. Refuses to Apply 'Bristol-Myers' to Class Actions
"This change is not warranted by the Supreme Court's decision in Bristol-Myers," wrote the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, reversing dismissal of a class action based on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California. Wednesday's ruling comes one day after the D.C. Circuit dodged the same question in a similar case.In Whole Foods Class Action, DC Circuit Punts on Whether Bristol-Myers Applies
The 2-1 ruling found that Whole Foods' dismissal motion, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California, was premature. But in a lengthy dissent, Judge Laurence Silberman found that Bristol-Myers should have applied to the class action.DC Circuit Punts on Whether Bristol-Myers Applies to Class Actions
The 2-1 ruling found that Whole Foods' dismissal motion, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California, was premature. But in a lengthy dissent, Judge Laurence Silberman found that Bristol-Myers should have applied to the class action.$110M Talc Verdict Reversed Based on 'Bristol-Myers'
Tuesday's ruling found that the plaintiff, who alleged she got ovarian cancer in 2012 from using Johnson & Johnson's baby powder, had no jurisdiction to bring her case in Missouri under the U.S. Supreme Court's Bristol-Myers ruling.Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now