Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Brayton Purcell, LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
October 21, 2010 |

Personal Jurisdiction Made Easy

Ninth Circuit appears to loosen its standard in cases of trademark infringement on certain websites, explains Bruce G. Chapman of Connolly Bove.
8 minute read
Washington Shoe Company v. A-Z Sporting Goods. Inc.
Publication Date: 2012-12-17
Practice Area: litigation
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Jay S. Bybee, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John W. Widell, Santa Fe, New Mexico; Timothy B. McCormack, Seattle, Washington, for Appellant–Cross-Appellee.
For defendant: Roger M. Townsend, Breskin, Johnson & Townsend PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for Appellee–Cross-Appellant.
Case number: No. 11-35166

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 13735WASHINGTON SHOE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee,v.p class="c

August 15, 2011 |

Zelasko-Barrett v. Brayton-Purcell, LLP

3 minute read
Fiore v. Walden
Publication Date: 2012-08-08
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Edward C. Reed, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Marsha S. Berzon, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert A. Nersesian and Thea Marie Sankiewicz, Nersesian & Sankiewicz, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
For defendant: Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Barbara L. Herwig and Kelsi Brown Corkran, Attorneys, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellees.
Case number: No. 08-17558

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 8972 GINA FIORE; KEITH GIPSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ANTHONY WALDEN; UNKNOWN AGEN

Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc.
Publication Date: 2012-11-16
Practice Area: personal injury
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding Before: A. Wallace Tashima, Susan P. Graber, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Cameron O. Carter, Brayton Purcell, LLP, Portland, Oregon; Philip A. Talmage (argued), and Sidney Tribe, Talmadge/Fitzpatrick, PLLC, Tukwila, Washington; Alan Brayton, Brayton Purcell, LLP, Novato, California, for Henry and Geraldine Barabin.
For defendant: Michael B. King (argued) and Emilia L. Sweeney, Carney Badley Spellman, P.S., Seattle, Washington, for AstenJohnson, Inc. Mary H. Spillane and Daniel W. Ferm, Williams, Kastner & Gibbs, PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc.
Case number: No. 10-36142, No. 11-35020

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 12729 HENRY BARABIN; GERALDINE BARABIN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ASTENJOHNSON, INC.,

August 22, 2011 |

No Overtime for Law Clerks, Calif. Appeal Court Rules

A California appeal court has found that a former law clerk is not entitled to overtime pay from his employer, even though he was not licensed to practice law when he worked there. The court wrote that Matthew Zelasko-Barrett's work fell under the "professional exemption" of the Labor Code and that he was engaged in a "learned profession," one of the code's exemptions.
2 minute read
September 26, 2005 |

2005 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
407 minute read
September 28, 2009 |

2009 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
388 minute read
September 24, 2010 |

2010 Ineligible List

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)
387 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources