Search Results

0 results for 'Barrack, Rodos & Bacine'

You can use to get even better search results
August 13, 2008 |

Barrack Rodos' $277 Mil. Win Overturned by District Court

What began as a banner year for Philadelphia-based national class action firm Barrack Rodos & Bacine has taken a bit of a downturn.
5 minute read
Barrack Rodos Pockets $48 Million Fee Award for Sticking Out Apollo Class Action
Publication Date: 2012-04-23
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Brushing aside objections by a group of shareholders, a judge in Phoenix gave final approval on Friday to the full $48.4 million in attorney fees Barrack Rodos had requested late last year as part of a $145 million class settlement.

June 12, 2002 |

Class Antitrust Litigator Joining Fox Rothschild

Fox Rothschild O`Brien & Frankel will begin its foray into class action antitrust litigation next week with the addition of former Barrack Rodos & Bacine partner Steven A. Asher.
3 minute read
August 13, 2008 |

Barrack Rodos' $277 Mil. Win Overturned by District Court

In January, Philadelphia-based national class action firm Barrack Rodos & Bacine helped a class of investors win a $277 million verdict awarded by a jury that said Phoenix-based for-profit corporation Apollo Group Inc. had misled investors. Now, a little over six months later, a Phoenix federal district court has thrown out the verdict, which was believed to have been the largest in a securities class action case since the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was passed in 1995.
5 minute read
February 04, 2008 |

Securities class action verdict in Univ. of Phoenix case may be recordbreaking

Law firm Barrack Rodos & Bacine has won what is believed to be the largest plaintiffs' verdict in a securities class action case since the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was passed in 1995. Apollo Group, which owns the University of Phoenix, and its former CEO and CFO were ordered to pay as much as $5.55 per share to shareholders who alleged that the company hid a government report charging that student recruitment practices violated federal rules. The full verdict amount is not yet known.
5 minute read
May 17, 1999 |

'Lead Plaintiff' Gets Lesson in Securities Class Actions

Charles Chalmers, a San Francisco lawyer, unknowingly became a "lead plaintiff" in one of 23 class actions alleging securities fraud by Digital Lightwave Inc., a maker of test products for high-speed telecommunications networks. Chalmers' experience sheds light on what happens in practice under the reforms to investor class actions that Congress enacted in 1995 to target abuses by plaintiffs lawyers. And if his saga is any example, the law may not be working as Congress intended.
8 minute read
May 17, 1999 |

Huh? I'm the Lead Plaintiff?

Plaintiffs' lawyers in a securities suit against Digital Lightwave Inc., accused of cooking the books to lure unwary investors, may have got more than they bargained for when they made San Francisco investor and lawyer Charles Chalmers a lead plaintiff. Chalmers, invoking a federal statute designed to give principal plaintiffs in such cases more control, claims a settlement in the case was inadequate and that, moreover, he was never properly informed of his status as a "class representative."
8 minute read
Greenlight Capital, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs v. Apple, Inc., Defendant, 13 Civ. 976
Publication Date: 2013-03-05
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Richard Sullivan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Greenlight is represented by: Ashley F Waters, Christopher Michael Egjeson, Michael A. Asaro, and Mitchell P. Hurley, Esqs., of Akin Gump Strauss Liauer & Feld, New York, NY.
For defendant: Gralnick is represented by: A. Arnold Gershon, Michael Arthur Toomey, and William J. Ban, Esqs., of Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, New York, NY., as Well as Jeffrey Alan Barrack, Esq., of Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Apple is represented by: Andrew Jay Frackman and Abby Faith Rudzin, Esqs., of O'melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 13 Civ. 976

Cite as: Greenlight Capital, L.P. v. Apple, Inc., 13 Civ. 976, NYLJ 1202590550081, at *1 (SDNY, Decided February 22, 2013)District Judge Richard Sull

Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Merrill Lynch, Inc., 09-3919-Cv
Publication Date: 2010-09-16
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Jacobs, Ch. J., B.D. Parker and Hall, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Policemen's annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, State-Boston Retirement System, Mf Global Institutional Investors Group Michael Rubin, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others similarly Situated, Plaintiff Nanette Katz, Frank Matassa, Sunshine Wire And Cable Defined benefit Plan Trust, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others similarly Situated, Michael J. Rudnick, Individually And On behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Consolidated-Plaintiffs Mark R. Rosen, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Philadelphia, Pa(Leonard Barrack, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Philadelphia, Pa; William J. Ban, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, New York, NY; Carol v. Gilden, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll Pllc, Chicago, Il; and Steven J. Toll, Daniel S. Sommers, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll Pllc, Washington, Dc On the Brief) For Appellants. David B. Anders (Bernard W .Nussbaum, Elaine P. Golin, and Christina T. Shay on the Brief),Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, Ny For Mf Global Appellees. Stuart J. Baskin, Herbert S .Washer, and Adam S. Hakki, Shearman & Sterling Llp, New york, Ny For Underwriter Appellees.
For defendant:
Case number: 09-3919-Cv

Cite as: Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Merrill Lynch, Inc. 09-3919-Cv, NYLJ 1202472076104, at *1 (2nd Cir., September 14, 2010)Before: Jacobs, Ch.

Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Merrill Lynch, Inc., 09-3919-Cv
Publication Date: 2010-09-16
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Jacobs, Ch. J., B.D. Parker and Hall, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Policemen's annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, State-Boston Retirement System, Mf Global Institutional Investors Group Michael Rubin, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others similarly Situated, Plaintiff Nanette Katz, Frank Matassa, Sunshine Wire And Cable Defined benefit Plan Trust, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others similarly Situated, Michael J. Rudnick, Individually And On behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Consolidated-Plaintiffs Mark R. Rosen, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Philadelphia, Pa(Leonard Barrack, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Philadelphia, Pa; William J. Ban, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, New York, NY; Carol v. Gilden, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll Pllc, Chicago, Il; and Steven J. Toll, Daniel S. Sommers, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll Pllc, Washington, Dc On the Brief) For Appellants. David B. Anders (Bernard W .Nussbaum, Elaine P. Golin, and Christina T. Shay on the Brief),Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, Ny For Mf Global Appellees. Stuart J. Baskin, Herbert S .Washer, and Adam S. Hakki, Shearman & Sterling Llp, New york, Ny For Underwriter Appellees.
For defendant:
Case number: 09-3919-Cv

Cite as: Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Merrill Lynch, Inc. 09-3919-Cv, NYLJ 1202472076104, at *1 (2nd Cir., September 14, 2010)Before: Jacobs, Ch.

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now