Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Bank of Nova Scotia'

You can use to get even better search results
February 28, 2020 | New York Law Journal

Shearman Sees Revenue Inch Up Amid Strategy to 'Reshape' Business

"You're seeing a drop in hours but an increase in revenue and profitability, which is exactly what we're trying to achieve," said senior partner David Beveridge.
5 minute read
Gaydos v. NYC Bike Share LLC
Publication Date: 2019-12-23
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York
Judge: Justice Louis Nock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 156496/2018

Court Denies Dismissal of Personal Injury Complaint by Citi Bike Member Against Defendants

Application of Chad
Publication Date: 2019-06-21
Practice Area: Bankruptcy | Civil Procedure | Discovery
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge William Pauley
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19 mc 261

Brazilian Bankruptcy's Judicial Administrator May Subpoena Evidence From Banks in New York

Appellate Division, First Department: March 12, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-03-13
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: March 12, 2019

January 23, 2019 | Texas Lawyer

Latham Adds Houston Oil & Gas Finance Partner from V&E

Trevor Wommack, an oil and gas finance lawyer, joined Latham & Watkins' Houston office as a partner, coming from Vinson & Elkins.
2 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Federal Bank Holding Company Law Authors: Melanie L. Fein View this Book

View more book results for the query "Bank of Nova Scotia"

January 07, 2019 | New York Law Journal

Government Misconduct in a Grand Jury Investigation: Is There a Remedy?

White-Collar Crime columnists Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan S. Sack provide a brief examination of the heavy burden on defendants who claim misconduct in grand jury proceedings. They then discuss a recent Second Circuit decision, which illustrates the reluctance of federal courts to dismiss charges and overturn jury verdicts based on prosecutorial misconduct, even when the government concedes that serious misconduct occurred.
10 minute read
U.S. v. Nordlicht
Publication Date: 2018-12-06
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Dora Irizarry
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 16-CR-640

Defendants Charged with Conspiracy Fail to Allege Grand Jury Secrecy Rule Violation

Matter of Commodity Exchange Inc., Gold Futures and Options Trading Litigation
Publication Date: 2018-07-31
Practice Area: Antitrust | White Collar Crime
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Valerie Caproni
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 14-MC-2548

UBS Dismissed From Gold Price Fixing Action; Direct Involvement in Suppression Lacking

Cooling Water Intake Structure Coal. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency
Publication Date: 2018-07-30
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Environmental Law
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Raymond Lohier
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew R. Wheeler, in his Official Capacity as Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency,* National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Respondents
For defendant: For Intervenor-Petitioner American Petroleum Institute: Fredric P. Andes, Jill M. Fortney, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL; Jeffrey S. Longsworth, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Washington, DC.; For Intervenors-Petitioners Utility Water Act Group, Entergy Corporation: Andrew J. Turner, Todd S. Mikolop, Kerry L. McGrath, on the brief, Kristy A.N. Bulleit, Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington, DC.; For Intervenors-Petitioners Riverkeeper Inc., American Littoral Society, Casco Baykeeper, Delaware Riverkeeper Network, Hackensack Riverkeeper, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Raritan Baykeeper, Inc. d/b/a NY/NJ Baykeeper, Save the Bay — Narragansett Bay, Scenic Hudson, Inc., Sierra Club, Soundkeeper, Inc., Surfrider Foundation, Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc., and for Intervenors Center for Biological Diversity, Louisiana Environmental Action Network, California Coastkeeper Alliance, Humboldt Baykeeper, Suncoast Waterkeeper, Inc., Puget Soundkeeper Alliance: Reed W. Super, Edan Rotenberg, Super Law Group, LLC, New York, NY.; For Intervenor-Petitioner Sierra Club, and for Intervenors Center for Biological Diversity, California Coastkeeper Alliance, Humboldt Baykeeper, Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Suncoast Waterkeeper, Inc.: Eric E. Huber, Sierra Club, Boulder, CO.; For Intervenors-Petitioners Environment America, Environment Massachusetts: Charles C. Caldart, National Environmental Law Center, Seattle, WA.; For Respondents: Simi Bhat, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense Section, Washington, DC, Clifford E. Stevens, Jr., United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Wildlife & Marine Resources Section, Denver, CO, on the brief; Richard T. Witt, Alexis Wade, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of General Counsel, of counsel, Perry M. Rosen, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Environmental Defense Section, Washington, DC; Bridget Kennedy McNeil, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Wildlife & Marine Resources Section, Denver, CO.; For Amicus Curiae Clean Air Task Force: Ann Brewster Weeks, Legal Director, Clean Air Task Force, Boston, MA, of counsel, Andrew K. Jacoby, Varadi, Hair & Checki, LLC, New Orleans, LA.
Case number: 14-4645

Rule, Opinions as to Water Intakes Were Based on Reasonable Interpretations of Statutes

December 14, 2017 | New York Law Journal

The Role of New York Residency in Forum Non Conveniens Dismissals

Commercial Division Update columnist Thomas J. Hall writes: Defendants bear a heavy burden of establishing that New York is not a convenient forum, and courts have discretion in considering a number of factors in determining the issue. While no one factor is controlling, the residency of the parties has emerged in recent Commercial Division decisions as an important factor.
21 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now