Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo'

You can use to get even better search results
August 23, 2017 | The Recorder

LA Hire Marks King & Spalding's Latest Litigation Addition

King & Spalding has hired white-collar litigation partner Brian Michael in Los Angeles, where he was deputy general counsel at 21st Century Fox and group chief compliance officer at the Fox Networks Group. Michael comes to King & Spalding a week after the firm opened an office in Chicago by adding another ex-federal prosecutor.
3 minute read
Bridges v. Mt. San Jacinto Community College District (Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District)
Publication Date: 2017-08-10
Practice Area:
Industry: Education
Court: C.A. 4th
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Law Offices of Robert A. Pool and Robert A. Pool for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
For defendant: Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, John W. Dietrich, David D. Boyer, and Jennifer D. Cantrell for Defendant and Respondent.
Case number: No. E065213

CEQA plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative remedies (Slough, J.)

California Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber Construction, Inc.
Publication Date: 2017-06-01
Practice Area:
Industry: Construction | Education | State and Local Government
Court: C.A. 1st
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Appellants: Kevin R. Carlin, Carlin Law Group, A.P.C.
For defendant: Attorneys for Respondent, Taber Construction: Jason R. Thornton, Louis J. Blum, Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP
Case number: No. A145078

Taxpayer association stated viable claim of conflict of interest with regard to lease-leaseback agreement (Miller, J.)

Manteca Unified School District v. Reclamation District No. 17
Publication Date: 2017-04-10
Practice Area:
Industry: Education
Court: C.A. 3rd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Michael J. Baker, David A. Soldani and Jennifer D. Cantrell for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.
For defendant: Freeman Firm, Thomas H. Keeling and Michael N. Morlan for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.
Case number: No. C077906

Reclamation district had authority to levy assessment on local school district (Raye, P.J.)

Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. American Asphalt South, Inc.
Publication Date: 2017-02-16
Practice Area:
Industry: Construction | State and Local Government
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Doyle & Schafer, Doyle Schafer McMahon, Daniel W. Doyle and David Klehm for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
For defendant: Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Scott K. Dauscher, Paul G. Szumiak and Jennifer D. Cantrell for Defendant and Respondent.
Case number:

Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 1438 ROY ALLAN SLURRY SEAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellant

Raceway Ford Cases
Publication Date: 2016-12-15
Practice Area:
Industry: Automotive | Retail | Consumer Products
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, Hallen D. Rosner, Christopher P. Barry, Angela J. Patrick and Lacee B. Smith for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
For defendant: Callahan, Thompson, Sherman & Caudill, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Kellie S. Christianson and Yvette N. Siegel for Defendant and Respondent.
Case number:

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 13151 RACEWAY FORD CASES. No. S222211 In the Supreme Court of Cali

McGee v. Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC
Publication Date: 2016-05-05
Practice Area:
Industry: Education | Construction
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Carlin Law Group and Kevin R. Carlin for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
For defendant: Finch, Thornton & Baird, Jason R. Thornton and Louis J. Blum for Defendant and Respondent Balfour Beatty Construction.
Case number: No. B262850

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 4738 JAMES D. McGEE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BALFOUR BE

February 22, 2016 |

Ninth Circuit Says Cooley Link Didn't Taint Arbitration Award

Cooley chair Stephen Neal lost back-to-back cases against Masimo Corp. But the company's legal team couldn't prove that prejudiced his brother, JAMS neutral Richard Neal, to exceed his powers in an employment dispute.
4 minute read
February 09, 2016 |

Bingham Refugees Find New Homes, Plus More Lateral Moves

A year after Morgan Lewis absorbed Bingham McCutchen, several lawyers from the latter find new homes; Fried Frank welcomes back an ex-partner; Jenner & Block brings on an M&A leader; and other additions from throughout The Am Law 200.
11 minute read
Golden Gate Hill Development Company, Inc. v. County of Alameda
Publication Date: 2015-11-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: C.A. 1st
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Greenberg Traurig, Bradley R. Marsh, William J. Goines and Karen Rosenthal, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Donna R. Ziegler, County Counsel, John T. Seyman and Farand C. Kan, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent County of Alameda.
Case number: No. A142500

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 12650 GOLDEN GATE HILL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appella

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now