Search Results

0 results for 'Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
November 16, 2011 |

Looking Back at Significant 2011 Cases

In his Law Firm Partnership Law column, Arthur J. Ciampi, the managing member of Ciampi LLC, writes that this year saw interesting decisions and actions in New York state and federal courts which addressed issues affecting law firms in the bankruptcy context, challenged the ban on non-lawyer investors in law firms, applied res judicata to limit duplicative claims in law firm partnership disputes, construed law firm agreements concerning amounts owing to former partners, and applied CPLR 3213 in the law firm context.
8 minute read
Geron v. Robinson & Cole LLP, 11 Civ. 8967
Publication Date: 2012-09-06
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge William H. Pauley
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: Howard P. Magaliff, Esq., DiConza Traurig Magaliff LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: Counsel for Robinson & Cole LLP: Christopher J. Major, Esq., Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY. Robert W. Dremluk, Esq., Seyfarth Shaw LLP, New York, NY Counsel for Seyfarth Shaw LLP: Thomas Feher, Esq., Thompson Hine LLP.
Case number: 11 Civ. 8967

Cite as: Geron v. Robinson & Cole LLP, 11 Civ. 8967, NYLJ 1202570212302, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 4, 2012)District Judge William H. Pauleyp

A.C. v. J.O., 53056/11
Publication Date: 2013-09-09
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Kings County, Part 5K
Judge: Justice Debra Silber
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Plaintiff: Pamela M. Sloan, Esq., Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP.
For defendant: Defendant: Maria Coffinas, Esq., Coffinas & Lusthaus. Children: Ira Forman, Esq.
Case number: 53056/11

Cite as: A.C. v. J.O., 53056/11, NYLJ 1202618182085, at *1 (Sup. KI, Decided August 12, 2013) 53056/11 Justice Debra Silber

July 27, 2012 |

Claims for Unfinished Business Should Be Avoided

In his Law Firm Partnership Law column, Arthur J. Ciampi, the managing member of Ciampi LLC, writes that the unfinished business doctrine application is inequitable, harms clients' choice of counsel, and violates the fee sharing rules.
13 minute read
Smith v. Walsh-Smith, 311784/07
Publication Date: 2008-07-25
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge: Harold Beeler
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 311784/07

Justice Harold B. Beeler NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Plaintiff-Husband's Attorney: By: David Aronson Esq. Sheresky Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan,

Johnson v Chapin
Publication Date: 2010-05-06
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2645

Gonzalez, P.J., Catterson, Moskowitz, Renwick, Richter, JJ. 2645-2645A Index 350749/01 Janet M. Johnson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v Allan M. Chapin, Defendant-A

Smith v Walsh-Smith
Publication Date: 2009-10-20
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1219 1219A

Tom, J.P., Buckley, Catterson, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 1219-1219A Index 311784/07 Philip J. Smith, Plaintiff-Respondent, v Tricia Walsh-Smith, Defendant-

Ronald S. v Lucille Diamond S.
Publication Date: 2007-11-08
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1516-1517

Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli, Sweeny, JJ. 1516-1517 Index 350668/03 Ronald S., Plaintiff-Respondent, v Lucille Diamond S., Defendant-Appella

DeLuca v DeLuca
Publication Date: 2008-02-26
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2895

Lippman, P.J., Tom, Nardelli, Catterson, Moskowitz, JJ. 2895 Index 101745/06 Jane M. DeLuca, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Peter C. DeLuca, Defendant-Respondent, Ja

New York County First Department SUPREME COURT,
Publication Date: 2012-01-31
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Justice Lucy BillingsZedek v. Kelly (103067/10)—Case DisposedTower Ins. Co of v. Gee (107428/10)—Case DisposedTucker v. Board of

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now