Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Arnold & Itkin LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
May 05, 2021 | The Recorder

'This Settlement Will Kill People': Objectors Persist in Critiques of Roundup Class Action Accord

An April 30 supplemental brief was filed for 93 law firms and 167 lawyers objecting to the $2 billion settlement. Public Justice and Public Citizen filed their own supplemental briefs, focused on several issues, including the release of punitive damage claims. An approval hearing is set for May 19.
5 minute read
March 05, 2021 | The Recorder

Opposition Erupts Over $2B Class Action Settlement Proposal in Roundup Lawsuits

More than a dozen law firms opposed the proposed class action settlement, the second attempt by Bayer to resolve lawsuits while keeping Roundup on store shelves. Public Citizen and the American Association for Justice also filed amicus briefs opposing the deal.
6 minute read
December 21, 2020 | BenefitsPro

Tyson argues federal orders eliminate liability in COVID-19 suits

Tyson's move to assert federal preemption could be a critical defense for companies facing COVID-19-related negligence claims.
7 minute read
December 10, 2020 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Tyson Foods Says Federal Law Preempts COVID-19 Lawsuits

In motions to dismiss, Tyson cited an April 28 executive order from President Donald Trump to keep meat plants open, and two regulatory laws, in arguing that federal law preempts lawsuits brought by employees who got sick or died from COVID-19.
9 minute read
December 10, 2020 | Law.com

'A Challenging Argument': Tyson Foods Says Federal Law Preempts COVID-19 Lawsuits

In motions to dismiss filed in Iowa and Texas, Tyson cited an April 28 executive order from President Donald Trump to keep meat plants open, as well as two regulatory laws, in arguing that federal law preempts lawsuits brought by employees who got sick or died from COVID-19.
9 minute read
September 02, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

Pa. Supreme Court Ruling Tees Up Possible Punitive Damages Phase of $70M Risperdal Verdict

The first—and, so far, only—Risperdal case to go to a punitive damages trial resulted in an $8 billion verdict last year, which has since been reduced to $6.8 million.
3 minute read
February 25, 2020 | New Jersey Law Journal

Janssen Rails Against Costs of Third-Party Records Management in Risperdal Case

Arnold & Itkin challenged the notion that Janssen did not know it would be responsible for accessing the documents, and argued that it has long had to pay for obtaining records.
4 minute read
February 24, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

'Chaotic, Unfair': Pharma Company Says It Shouldn't Bear Costs for Third-Party Records Management in Risperdal Case

Arnold & Itkin challenged the notion that Janssen did not know it would be responsible for accessing the documents, and argued that it has long had to pay for obtaining records.
4 minute read
November 26, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer

Superior Court Affirms $70M Risperdal Verdict, Remands for Possible Punitives

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled that a $70 million jury verdict against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Janssen and in favor of a child allegedly injured by antipsychotic drug Risperdal was not excessive, and has also remanded the case for a second look at whether there should be a punitive damages trial.
4 minute read
September 05, 2019 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Barbara Technologies Decision Did Not Overrule Mainali's 'Reasonableness' Exception, Texas Court Says

A Texas court has ruled that a "reasonableness exception" limiting an insurer's liability under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act was not overruled by a recent decision by the Texas Supreme Court.
4 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources