Search Results

0 results for 'Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
October 18, 2017 | The American Lawyer

With BLP Merger, Bryan Cave Would Get Bigger. But Will It Be Better?

Partners wary about a "merge until youy're mega" strategy will have to decide whether a pitch by firm leaders stressing innovation and practice group synergies is enough to approve a deal.
6 minute read
Merrick v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.
Publication Date: 2017-08-16
Practice Area:
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary,* District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: James C. Mitchell (argued), The Gilleon Law Firm, San Diego, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Sherry Swieca (argued), Jackson Lewis P.C., Los Angeles, California; Kelly D. Gemelli, Jackson Lewis P.C., San Diego, California; for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: No. 14-56853

Senior hotel employee failed to show that layoff was result of age discrimination (Zouhary, J.)

Orange County Water District v. SABIC Innovative Plastics US, LLC
Publication Date: 2017-08-07
Practice Area:
Industry: Mining and Resources | State and Local Government
Court: C.A. 4th
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Connor Fletcher & Hedenkamp, Edmond M. Connor, Douglas Aaron Hedenkamp; Miller & Axline, Duane C. Miller, Michael Dana Axline and Justin Morgan Massey, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Squire Patton Boggs, Adam R. Fox, Helene Huang Yang and Marisol Corral Mork, for Defendants and Respondents Sabic Innovative Plastics US, LLC, and General Electric Company.
Case number: No. D070553

Water district not required to demonstrate liability for remediation costs caused by groundwater pollution in order to bring private cause of action for indemnity under HSAA (Haller, J.)

August 07, 2017 | New York Law Journal

'A Better Deal' on Antitrust Enforcement: Can Democrats Catch the Populist Wave?

Antitrust Trade and Practice columnists Shepard Goldfein and James Keyte write: Although there was no meaningful proposal by Congress during the Obama administration to re-write the antitrust laws to make big "bad" once again, to regulate the pricing of lawful monopolists, or to use the antitrust laws as a tool for social and economic engineering, harkening back to the trust-busting days of old, the 2018 midterm elections beckon, and Congressional Democrats do not want to miss the populist wave a second time.
19 minute read
July 20, 2017 | The American Lawyer

The American Lawyer Announces its Fifth Annual Global Legal Awards Winners

Law firms are honored for excellence in global work in four main categories: disputes, finance, citizenship and mergers and acquisitions.
6 minute read
Retail Digital Network, LLC v. Prieto
Publication Date: 2017-06-14
Practice Area:
Industry: Advertising
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, William A. Fletcher, Ronald M. Gould, Richard A. Paez, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Jay S. Bybee, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Mary H. Murguia and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Olivier Taillieu (argued) and Raffi V. Zerounian, The Taillieu Law Firm, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Joshua A. Klein (argued), Deputy Solicitor General; Edward C. DuMont, Solicitor General; California Department of Justice, San Francisco, California; Gabrielle H. Brumbach, Deputy Attorney General; Gary S. Balekjian, Supervising Deputy Attorneys General; Chris A. Knudsen, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, San Francisco, California; for Defendant-Appellee.
Case number: No. 13-56069

Statute prohibiting alcohol manufacturers providing anything of value to retailers in exchange for advertising does not violate First Amendment (Paez, J.)

Featherstone v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group
Publication Date: 2017-04-20
Practice Area:
Industry: Health Care
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Nixon Peabody, Michael R. Lindsay, Alicia C. Anderson and Mae K. Hau for Plaintiff and Respondent.
For defendant: Rushovich Mehtani, Aanand Ghods-Mehtani and Lisa M. Watanabe-Peagler for Defendant and Appellant.
Case number: No. B275225

Employer's refusal to allow employee to rescind prior resignation not adverse employment action under FEHA (Johnson, J.)

April 11, 2017 |

Kirkland's Gross Revenue, Partner Profits Hit New Highs

The Chicago-based Am Law 100 firm had a 2016 to remember, as gross revenue rose 15 percent and profits per partner soared nearly 14 percent, helping Kirkland & Ellis break financial records.
47 minute read
April 11, 2017 | The American Lawyer

Kirkland's Gross Revenue, Partner Profits Hit New Highs

The Chicago-based Am Law 100 firm had a 2016 to remember, as gross revenue rose 15 percent and profits per partner soared nearly 14 percent, helping Kirkland & Ellis break financial records.
47 minute read
Scholes v. Lambirth Trucking Company
Publication Date: 2017-04-07
Practice Area:
Industry: Transportation
Court: C.A. 3rd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Vincent E. Scholes, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Anwyl, Scoffield & Steep, James T. Anwyl and Lynn A. Garcia for Defendant and Respondent.
Case number: No. C070770

Lack of detail in ordinal complaint precluded application of relation-back doctrine for subsequently filed amendment (Raye, P.J.)

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now