Search Results

0 results for 'Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
Federal Trade Comm. v. Vyera Pharms. LLC
Publication Date: 2020-08-25
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission: Markus H. Meier, Bradley S. Albert, Armine Black Daniel W. Butrymowicz, D. Patrick Huyett, Neal J. Perlman, J. Maren Schmidt, James H. Weingarten, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC. For Plaintiff State of New York: Letitia James, Christopher D'Angelo, Elinor R. Hoffman, Saami Zain, Amy McFarlane, Jeremy Kasha, Bryan Bloom, Office of the New York Attorney General Antitrust Bureau, New York, NY. For Plaintiff State of California: Michael D. Battaglia, Office of the Attorney General of California, San Francisco, CA. For Plaintiff State of Ohio: David Yost, Beth Finnerty, Elizebeth M. Maag, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, OH. For Plaintiff Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Josh Shapiro, Tracy W. Wertz, Joseph Betsko, Stephen Scannell, Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Harrisburg, PA. For Plaintiff State of Illinois: Richard S. Schultz, Office of the Attorney General of Illinois, Chicago, IL. For Plaintiff State of North Carolina: Joshua H. Stein, K.D. Sturgis, Jessica V. Sutton, North Carolina Dept. of Justice, Consumer Protection Division, Raleigh, NC. For Plaintiff Commonwealth of Virginia: Mark R. Herring, Sarah Oxenham Allen, Tyler T. Henry, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA.
For defendant: For Defendants Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Phoenixus AG: Stacey Anne Mahoney, Sarah E. Hsu Wilbur, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY., Scott A. Stempel, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, D.C. Steven A. Reed, Francis A. DeSimone, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA. Noah J. Kaufman, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, One Federal Street, Boston, MA. For Defendant Martin Shkreli: Christopher H. Casey, Esq., A.J. Rudowitz, Esq., Duane Morris LLP, Philadelphia, PA. Edward T. Kang, Kandis L. Kovalsky, Kang, Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC, Philadelphia, PA. For Defendant Kevin Mulleady: Kevin J. Arquit, Albert Shemmy Mishaan, Kenneth R. David, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 20cv706

UTPCPL Claim Fails to Adequately Allege Shkreli's Anticompetitive Conduct Was Fraudulent

In re Namenda Direct Purchasers Antitrust Litigation
Publication Date: 2020-06-25
Practice Area: Antitrust | Attorney Compensation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: Chief Judge Colleen McMahon
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 15 Civ. 7488

Settlement Approved But Class Counsel Awarded Twice Inflated Lodestar as 'Success Fee'

Frei v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc.
Publication Date: 2020-03-16
Practice Area: Products Liability | Toxic Torts
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Vincent Briccetti
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19 CV 2939

Strict Liability, Failure to Warn Claims Against Generic Drug's Maker Federally Preempted

January 24, 2020 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co.

Click Here for ICLC Expert Analysis Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co. 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165129 United States District Court…
42 minute read
December 09, 2019 | Delaware Business Court Insider

InterDigital Names New Del.-Based Chief Legal Officer Days After Filing Huawei Lawsuit

Deputy general counsel Richard Gulino's promotion comes just five days after InterDigital filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.K. against the Chinese telecommunications company.
3 minute read
December 09, 2019 | Corporate Counsel

InterDigital Names New Chief Legal Officer Days After Filing Huawei Lawsuit

Deputy general counsel Richard Gulino's promotion comes just five days after InterDigital filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.K. against the Chinese telecommunications company.
3 minute read
Biocad JSC v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Date: 2019-11-12
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Denny Chin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Gregory G. Rapawy and Julius P. Taranto, on the brief, David C. Frederick, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C, Washington, DC, and Albert Feinstein, Feinstein & Partners, P.L.L.C., New York, New York.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Genentech, Inc.: Amanda P. Reeves, Roman Martinez, Benjamin W. Snyder, and Lawrence E. Buterman, on the brief, Daniel M. Wall, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, New York; San Francisco, California; and Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Roche Holding AG: Andrew S. Gehring, on the brief, Paul Spagnoletti, Davis Polk & Wardell LLP, New York, New York. For Defendant-Appellee R-Pharm JSC: Caitlin J. Halligan, Eric J. Stock, and Alejandro A. Herrera, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, New York.
Case number: 17-3486

Foreign Nature of Drug Firm's Claims Placed Them Beyond Reach of U.S. Antitrust Laws

AstraZenica AB v. Mylan Pharm. Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-11-06
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver, and Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gary M. Rubman, Douglas A. Behrens, and Anna Q. Han, Covington & Burlington LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jason J. Rawnsley, and Alexandra M. Ewing, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Shannon M. Bloodworth, Perkins Coie LLP, Washington, DC; David L. Anstaett and Emily J. Greb, Perkins Coie LLP, Madison, WI for defendants.
Case number: D68758

Court transferred venue where one party was not a domicilary of the jurisdiction and there was no basis to impute venue from the resident co-defendant under a theory of successor-in-interest or agency, and factors weighed in favor of transfer of the entire litigation.

In re Actos Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
Publication Date: 2019-10-15
Practice Area: Antitrust | Patent Licensing and Transactions
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Ronnie Abrams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 15-CV-3278

Monopolization Claim Under Novel Non-Reverse Payment Theory Legally Unsupported

August 30, 2019 | Litigation Daily

Litigators of the Week: Morgan Lewis IP Aces Save Babies' Lives—and Taxpayers Money

"We hid the ball on our best defense and our gamble paid off.'
8 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now