Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Amgen Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
Publication Date: 2001-02-13
Practice Area: patents
Industry:
Court: Fed. Cir.;
Judge: MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL and SCHALL, Circuit Judges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Herbert F. Schwartz et al.
For defendant: John F. Sweeney et al.
Case number: 00-1398

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. MAYER, Chief Judge. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Roxane Laboratories, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation (col

Anascape, Ltd. v. Nintendo of America Inc.
Publication Date: 2010-04-21
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Fed. Cir.
Judge: Newman, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2008-1500

Published opinionBefore NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Newman. Concurring Opinion filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA.Nintendo of America Inc

International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp.
Publication Date: 2009-12-21
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Fed. Cir.
Judge: Dyk, Circuit Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2009-1237

Published opinionBefore BRYSON, CLEVENGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER.Plaintiff-Appellant In

Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Paddock Laboratories Inc., 09 Civ. 1905
Publication Date: 2010-06-08
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Leonard Sand
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09 Civ. 1905

District Judge Leonard B. Sand U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Jay Philip Lefkowitz, Kirkland &

November 17, 2011 |

Capital Formation And Congress

In his Corporate Securities column, John C. Coffee Jr., the Adolf A. Berle Professor of Law at Columbia University Law School and Director of its Center on Corporate Governance, notes that over the last few weeks, the House of Representatives has passed three bills, in each case by an over 400 vote margin, that create new exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933 in the hopes of fostering job creation and explores the legislation's potential impact.
23 minute read
June 10, 2013 |

Rebutting the Presumption of Reliance in Securities Class Actions

Roger A. Cooper, Matthew M. Bunda and Anthony M. Shults of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton write: Because few securities cases go to trial, there have been few cases in which courts have considered whether defendants have, on an individual basis, rebutted the presumption of reliance established in 'Basic v. Levinson.' A recent decision from the Southern District of New York, however, "is just such an extraordinary case."
12 minute read
Pharma Price Fixing Case Peters Out at High Court
Publication Date: 2013-06-03
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

It's been a tough slog through the courts for a group of pharmacy plaintiffs with antitrust claims against some of the biggest drug companies in the land. Plaintiffs lawyer Joseph Alioto stuck with the case for nearly a decade, including through two trips to the California Supreme Court. Now he's finally run out of appeals.

July 25, 2006 |

New CPLR 7502(c): Can Legislature Interpret Federal Law for N.Y.?

Robert P. Knapp III, a member of Mulholland & Knapp, writes that one of the peculiarities of our federal system of concurrent federal and state jurisdiction is that each court system can make its own interpretation of the same law. Until the highest court in either system � the U.S. Supreme Court for the federal system and the New York Court of Appeals for this state � has issued a definitive interpretation of a federal or state law, the same law can be given contradictory interpretations in each system.
12 minute read
In re Atmel Corp. v. LM Ericsson Telefon AB
Publication Date: 2005-05-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Unknown
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Lynch Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA), Inc. ("Sony Ericsson") moves to quash a deposition subpoena is

Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.
Publication Date: 2002-04-03
Practice Area: biolaw | patents
Industry:
Court: Fed. Cir.
Judge: Lourie, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 01-1230

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkJudge Alvin K. HellersteinDissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK.Enzo Biochem, Inc. appeals from the de

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources