Search Results

0 results for 'Advanced Micro Devices'

You can use to get even better search results
In re Application of Al-Attabi
Publication Date: 2022-02-01
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge Robert Lehrburger
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21-MC-207

Lebanese Bank Is Denied Quash of Subpoena for Discovery From Nonparty U.S. Banks

January 25, 2022 | Legaltech News

'Never Trust, Always Verify': The Pillars of Zero Trust Security

There is a need for rapid deployment of Zero Trust, but it must be done in a practical way. In planning for Zero Trust, it is important to know that Zero Trust is premised upon five pillars: identity, device, network/environment, application workload, and data.
8 minute read
January 06, 2022 | Law.com

As COVID-19 Evolves, So Too Does Firms' Cybersecurity Risk

What worked last year may now not be enough to ward off infection as cyber scams become harder to detect and more sophisticated.
7 minute read
Looney v. Macy's Inc
Publication Date: 2022-01-03
Practice Area: Premises Liability
Industry: Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Diane Gujarati
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Macy's Inc., Cross Claimant, v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation, Cross Defendant
For defendant: Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation, Cross Claimant, v. Macy's Inc., Cross Defendant
Case number: 16-CV-04814

Injured Plaintiff Fails to Show That Macy's Created or Knew of Escalator's Condition

December 03, 2021 | New Jersey Law Journal

Zero Trust Security: Moving From 'Trust but Verify' to 'Never Trust, Always Verify'

We have arrived at the age of 'Never Trust, Always Verify.' Zero Trust is truly a paradigm shift: no user is deemed trustworthy, continuous verification is required, and access inside the perimeter does not guarantee unfettered movement. Zero Trust is premised upon the five pillars examined in this article.
8 minute read
Charter Commc'ns Inc. v. Jewett
Publication Date: 2021-11-26
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Employment Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Brenda Sannes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Petitioner: Daniel P. Jaffe, Husch Blackwell LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: Randall S. Thompson, Husch Blackwell LLP, St. Louis, MO. Respondent Pro Se: Eric Jewett Watertown, NY. For Intervenor: Erin Sobkowski, New York State Division of Human Rights Office of General Counsel, Buffalo, NY. Robert A. Goldstein, New York State Division of Human Rights, Bronx, NY.
Case number: 5:21-cv-959

Court Denies Motion to Enjoin Respondent From Pursing Hearing Outside Arbitration

Appellate Division, Second Department: September 29, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-10-01
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department: September 29, 2021

August 03, 2021 | New York Law Journal

Supreme Court To Decide If International Commercial Arbitrations Are 'Foreign or International Tribunals' to Whom U.S. Federal Courts Can Provide Discovery Assistance

In their Arbitration column, Samuel Estreicher, Rex Heinke and Jessica Weisel discuss a case that will be before the U.S. Supreme Court in the October term, 'Servotronics v. Rolls-Royce PLC', which asks the court to resolve a circuit split over the role, if any, that federal courts should play in facilitating discovery in foreign arbitrations. In what looks like a simple matter of statutory interpretation—defining the term "tribunal"—the case may shed new light on how the current court approaches traditional interpretive tools.
8 minute read
Application of the Fund v. AlixPartners LLP
Publication Date: 2021-07-23
Practice Area: Discovery | Dispute Resolution | International Law
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee: Carlos Ramos-Mrosovsky, Rajat Rana, Robert Poole, on the brief, Alexander A. Yanos, Alston & Bird LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Third-Party Defendants-Appellants: Joseph T. Baio, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 20-2653-cv

Russian Firm 'Interested' in Foreign Arbitration Granted Discovery Under 28 USC §1782

Salinas v. State of Texas
Publication Date: 2021-05-31
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law | Evidence
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Contreras
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 13-19-00504-CR

Appellant challenged the denial of his motion to suppress following his convictions for two counts of possession of child pornography, a third-degree felony.

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now