Search Results

0 results for ''Richards, Layton & Finger, PA''

You can use to get even better search results
Averon US, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Hughes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Tracy L. Pearson, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Wilmington, DE; Joseph Diamante, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, New York, NY; Raymond Jones, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Leesburg, VA; William Flachsbart, Mark Magas, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
For defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jason James Rawnsley, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; David S. Almeling, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA; Timothy S. Durst, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Dallas, TX for defendants.
Case number: 1:22-cv-01341-TMH

Court declined to dismiss trade secret claims where the parties' contracts could be reasonably interpreted to impose a duty of confidentiality upon defendant to protect plaintiff's disclosed proprietary technology.

Magnolia Med. Tech., Inc. v. Kurin, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-08-21
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Rodger Dallery Smith II, Anthony David Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ashok Ramani, David J. Lisson, Micah G. Block, Ian Hogg, Serge A. Voronov, Davis Polk & Wardell LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Kathryn B. Bi, Alena Farber, Davis Polk & Wardell LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Nicole Kathleen Pedi, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Catherine Nyarady, Kripa Raman, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY; Nicholas Groombridge, Groombridge, Wu, Baughman & Stone LLP, New York, NY; Jonathan Hangartner, X-Patents, APC, La Jolla, CA for defendant.
Case number: 19-97-CFC

Court stayed motion for judgment of indefiniteness where plaintiff's expert described claim limitation as functional despite court construing it as structural, potentially giving defendant a viable argument in support of a motion for judgment as a matter of law of noninfringement.

Ajay Endeavors, Inc. v. Divvymed, LLC
Publication Date: 2023-04-11
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kathleen M. Miller, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Massimo D’Angelo, Akerman LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Christine Dealy Haynes, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Christopher Andrews, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case number: 20-cv-1556-SB

Unilateral mistake claim not dismissed where plaintiffs plausibly alleged they were unaware of defendants' failure to amend the parties' contract as agreed and that defendants knew of plaintiffs' mistake.

Nexstar Media Inc. v. Spectrum Mgmt. Holding Co., LLC
Publication Date: 2022-01-25
Practice Area: Telecommunications
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss, Daniel John McBride, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mitchell A. Kamin, Mark Chen, Covington & Burling LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Lindsay Barnhart, Covington & Burling LLP, Palo Alto, CA for plaintiff.
For defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Howard J. Symons, Jenner & Block LLP, New York, NY; Megan B. Poetzel, Lina R. Powell, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case number: D69691

Federal court lacked federal jurisdiction over breach of contract claim where FCC antitrust regulations were not sufficiently substantial enough to the case to warrant the exercise of jurisdiction.

Data Engine Techs. LLC v. Google LLC
Publication Date: 2019-12-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wimington, DE; Amir Alavi,, Demetrios Anaipakos, Alisa A. Lipski, Timothy Shelby, Scott W. Clark, Monica Uddin, Nathan Campbell, and Louis Liao, Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing, P.C., Houston, TX for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell and Jason J. Rawnsley, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Gregory P. Stone, Eric P. Tuttle, Zachary M. Briers, Hannah Dubina, Ashley D. Kaplan and Peter A. Detre, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case number: D68816

Court ruled that a preamble term was limiting because it was essential to understand the remaining terms in the claim, and accepted defendant's proposed construction where the intrinsic evidence required construing the term as requiring a mathematical relationship.

Capone v. LDH Mgmt Holdings LLC
Publication Date: 2018-05-09
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Daniel A. Dreisbach and Ryan P. Durkin, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., Stephen L. Urbanczyk, Paul Mogin, Steven M. Cady, and Matthew H. Blumenstein, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for plaintiffs
For defendant: Donald J. Wolfe, Jr., T. Brad Davey, and Seth R. Tangman, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew Ditchfield, David B. Toscano, Edward Fu, and Sagar D. Thakur, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for defendants.
Case number: D68134

Cancellation certificate nullified where LLC failed to set aside reserve for viable, non-frivolous claims that it had knowledge of.

Duffy v. Delaware State Univ.
Publication Date: 2018-01-17
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Mahala Duffy, pro se plaintiff
For defendant: Jennifer C. Bebko Jauffret and Lori Ann Brewington, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendant.
Case number: D68006

Employment discrimination complaint dismissed where plaintiff mailed her complaint to the court for filing on the 90th day after receipt of her right to sue letter, such that the complaint was filed beyond the 90-day period following receipt of a right to sue letter.

December 15, 2017 | The American Lawyer

Bernstein Litowitz Finds Role for Investors in Fight Against Sexual Harassment

Can the threat of investor litigation solve sexual harassment problems in the corporate world?
25 minute read
November 27, 2017 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Sleet Tosses Challenge to Fannie, Freddie Bailout Repayment

A Delaware federal judge on Monday dismissed a derivative shareholder lawsuit challenging the U.S. government's ability to seize all of the quarterly profits generated by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after the companies' bailout in the financial crisis.
16 minute read
November 17, 2017 | Delaware Law Weekly

Argument Scrapped in Lawsuit Over Prison Riot Death

A Delaware federal judge on Friday postponed a key hearing on motions to dismiss a lawsuit by the survivors of the deadly Feb. 1 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, after an attorney for two former governors said the parties were actively pursuing talks in the case.
6 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now