Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Sandberg Phoenix Von Gontard''

You can use to get even better search results
February 22, 2018 | Pro Mid Market

Midsize Firms Have an Edge With Millennials, If They Listen

Midsize firms are finding ways to bridge the generational divide and take advantage of millennial strengths.
6 minute read
February 21, 2018 |

The Challenges of a Multi-Generational Workplace Are No Surprise

As of just more than one year ago, the 53.5 million millennials in the U.S. workforce make up the single largest generation of American workers.
4 minute read
November 27, 2017 | The American Lawyer

At Midsize Firms, It Pays to Give Millennials a Voice

It's not just the biggest or the richest firms that are finding new ways to get the most out of their youngest lawyers.
18 minute read
May 26, 2017 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Johnson v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis  Norwood-Redfield Apts. LP v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.United States District Court for the Eastern…
11 minute read
February 01, 2016 |

Holland & Knight Hires in Connecticut, Plus More Lateral Moves

The latest Dickstein Shapiro defectors are hired by Holland & Knight; Jones Day adds an IP trio; Kirkland & Ellis recruits a senior SEC official; Latham & Watkins lands a high-profile lateral in Germany; and other notable additions from throughout The Am Law 200.
10 minute read
Bobbitt v. Milberg LLP
Publication Date: 2015-09-10
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Frank R. Zapata, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, John B. Owens, Circuit Judge, and Anthony J. Battaglia,* District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Lawrence A. Kasten (argued), Robert H. McKirgan, and William G. Voit, Lewis Roca Rothberber LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; Guy M. Hohmann and Ryan T. Shelton, Hohmann, Taube & Summers LLP, Austin, Texas; R. James George, Jr. and Gary L. Lewis, George, Brothers, Kincaid & Horton, LLP, Austin, Texas, for Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Douglas J. Pepe (argued), Gregory P. Joseph, Honey L. Kober, and Jeffrey H. Zaiger, Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC, New York, New York; Peter Akmajian, Ed Moomjian II, and Michele G. Thompson, Udall Law Firm LLP, Tucson, Arizona, for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: No. 13-15812

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 10171 PHILIP BOBBITT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; JOHN J. SAMPSON; JOHN HALL; BRENDA HALL, Plaint

December 22, 2014 |

Legal Mal Actions Against Civil Defense Attorneys: Part I

With more than 1.2 million lawyers in the United States (almost 50,000 active attorneys in Pennsylvania alone), the frequency and severity of legal malpractice actions are unquestionably on the rise. Historically, legal malpractice claims are dominated by the areas of plaintiffs personal injury and real estate, which together account for about half of all legal malpractice actions.
6 minute read
Sutherland Global Services, Inc., Petitioner v. Adam Technologies International, SA DE C.V., Respondent, 12-CV-6439
Publication Date: 2014-11-06
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Western District
Judge: District Judge Michael Telesca
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 12-CV-6439

Cite as: Sutherland Global Services, Inc. v. Adam Tech. International, 12-C , NYLJ 1202675545930, at *1 (WDNY, Decided October 29, 2014) 12-C

Kevin Mieschberger, Plaintiff v. Dana Corporation, Dana Holding Corporation, and Eaton Corporation, Defendants, 11-CV-0776 (JS)(WDW)
Publication Date: 2011-10-20
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Joanna Seybert
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Daniel Patrick Miklos, Esq., Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C., Garden City, NY.
For defendant: For Defendants Dana Corporation: N. Noelle Letcher, Esq., Coughlin Duffy LLP, Morristown, NJ. Dana Holding Corporation: Jonathan T. Barton, Esq., N. Noelle Letcher, Esq., Sandberg, Phoenix & von Gontard, St. Louis, MO. Eaton Corporation: Jonathan T. Barton, Esq., N. Noelle Letcher, Esq., Sandberg, Phoenix & von Gontard, St. Louis, MO. Eaton Corporation: Linda Stephanie Strauss, Esq., Coughlin Duffy LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 11-CV-0776 (JS)(WDW)

Cite as: Mieschberger v. Dana Corpo., 11-CV-0776(JS)(WDW), NYLJ 1202519275828, at *1 (EDNY, Decided October 11, 2011)District Judge Joanna Seybertp c

May 13, 2008 |

Computer Law

Richard Raysman, a partner at Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner, and Peter Brown, a partner at Baker & Hostetler, write that the Supreme Court's decision in Hall Street obviously reminded counsel to pay attention to provisions that address the scope of judicial review of awards when drafting instruments that provide for arbitration governed by the FAA. What remains uncertain, however, is whether there are any methods for review beyond those provided for in the relevant sections of the FAA. Can parties contract around the decision by explicitly providing that arbitration will be governed under state law?
10 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now