Search Results

0 results for ''Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
Nakamura v. BRF S.A.
Publication Date: 2018-07-10
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge P. Kevin Castel
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 18-cv-2213

Pension Fund Best Positioned To Be Lead Plaintiff in Securities Fraud Class Suit

Lucescu v. Zafirovski
Publication Date: 2018-05-17
Practice Area: Class Actions | Securities Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For the plaintiffs: Samuel H. Rudman, David A. Rosenfeld, Erin W. Boardman, Alan I. Ellman; Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Melville, NY.
For defendant: For the defendants: Joel C. Haims, Jamie A. Levitt, James J. Beha II, Steven T. Rappoport, Christina L. Golden, Lauren Gambier; Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 09cv4691

Class Action Dismissed; Executives Statements Were General and Not Customer-Specific

April 10, 2018 | The Recorder

Feud Erupts Over Whether Tezos ICO Lawsuit Should Be Split in Two

A San Diego securities lawyer is trying to get his case against the blockchain project back to state court. But fellow plaintiffs attorneys object, saying he "should not be permitted to split the baby or get a second bite at the apple."
3 minute read
In re: Remicade Antitrust Litig.
Publication Date: 2018-02-13
Practice Area: Antitrust | Class Actions
Industry: Biotechnology | Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Joyner
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 18-0143

Court appointed single-firm structure for interim class counsel where risks of increased costs and difficulty in managing multi-firm structure outweighed any benefits multi-firm structure had in effectively serving prospective class. Plaintiffs application to appoint interim class counsel granted.

Van Der Fluit v. Yates
Publication Date: 2017-12-13
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer, and David M. Sborz, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stuart A. Davidson and Christopher Martins, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Boca Raton, FL; David T. Wissbroecker and Edward Gergosian, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA, attorneys for plaintiff
For defendant: Thomas A. Beck, Blake Rohrbacher, and Susan M. Hannigan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendants.
Case number: D67968

Although proxy failed to disclose identity of selling companys key negotiators, stockholders challenge to tender offer and merger transaction dismissed for failure to plead non-exculpated claims against co-founders and directors, where there was no evidence that majority of board and tendering stockholders were interested or non-independent.

December 05, 2017 | Law.com

Skilled in the Art: Why Oracle's Chances Look Slim in Second Java Appeal

Oracle and Google return to the Federal Circuit Thursday to once again argue whether Google's copying of 11,000 lines of code was fair use. Here's why Oracle probably can't win.
24 minute read
November 21, 2017 | The Recorder

Ninth Circuit Upholds Yelp Win in Bogus Review Case

Investors had accused the online review site of propping up its earnings by coercing businesses into buying ads to get fake negative reviews removed.
11 minute read
In re Good Technology. Corp. Stockholder Litig.
Publication Date: 2017-11-08
Practice Area: Corporate Entities | Corporate Governance
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, and Christopher P. Quinn, Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Randall J. Barron, A. Rick Atwood, and Esther Lee, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA, attorneys for plaintiffs
For defendant: Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Frank R. Martin, and Travis R. Dunkelberger, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; William M. Lafferty, Ryan D. Stottman, and Alexandra M. Cumings, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward B. Micheletti, Alyssa S. O'Connell, Sarah Runnells Martin, and Lauren N. Rosenello, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendants.
Case number: D67927

Submitting disputes to sole authority and exclusive jurisdiction of neutral party indicated parties intent to submit to arbitration, and designated neutral with conflicts of interest had authority to rule on procedural matters of appointing alternate arbiter.

October 30, 2017 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Laster Sends Challenge to Good Technology Settlement to Arbitration

Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster sided with the investors, who argued a challenge to a proposed $35 million settlement between Good Technology stockholders and deal adviser J.P. Morgan Securities should play out in private.
16 minute read
September 15, 2017 | New York Law Journal

Barclays Prevails in Mortgage Crisis-Related Class Suit

U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty has, over the eight-year life span of a securities suit against Barclays, continued to whittle down the claimants and claims against the bank. On Wednesday, he succeeded in getting rid of the last one.
19 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now