Search Results

0 results for ''Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
In re: Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litig.
Publication Date: 2020-02-19
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Automotive
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jay W. Eisenhofer, Christine M. Mackintosh, Kelly L. Tucker, Vivek Upadhya and Daniel L. Berger, Grant & Eisenhofer, Wilmington, DE and New York, NY; Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, Robin Winchester and Justin O. Reliford, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA; Randall J. Baron, David T. Wissbroecker and Maxwell R. Huffman, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA for co-lead plaintiffs.
For defendant: David E. Ross, Garrett B. Moritz and Benjamin Z. Grossberg, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Evan R. Chesler, Daniel Slifkin, Vanessa A. Lavely and Helam Gebremariam, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY for director defendants.
Case number: D68883

Genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment regarding questions of shareholder ratification of a merger, the existence of a conflicted controller and corporate waste.

Orion Property Grp. LLC v. Hjelle
Publication Date: 2020-01-22
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Real Estate
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Joanna Seybert
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: David Slarskey, Esq., Slarskey LLC, New York, New Yok.
For defendant: Vincent Michael Serra, Esq., Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP, Melville, New York. Christopher C. Gold, Esq., pro hac vice, Rachel L. Jensen, Esq., pro hac vice, Bradley Beall, Esq., pro hac vice, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Boca Raton, Florida. Barbara C. Frankland, Esq., Larkin E. Walsh, Esq., Rex. A. Sharp, Esq., Scott B. Goodger, Esq., Ryan C. Hudson, Esq., pro hac vice, Rex A. Sharp, PA, Prairie Village, Kansas. Brennan P. Fagan, Esq., pro hac vice, Fagan Emert & Davis, L.L.C., Lawrence, Kansas. William Skepnek, Esq., pro hac vice, Skepnek Law Firm, Lawrence, Kansas. For Defendant: William Edward Vita, Esq., Westerman Ball Ederer Miller & Sharfstein, LLP, Uniondale, New York. Kelly H. Foos, Esq., pro hac vice, Paul A. Williams, Esq., pro hac vice, Robert J. McCully, Esq., pro hac vice, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Kansas City, Missouri.
Case number: 19-CV-0044

RICO Suit Over CEO's 'Administrative Fee' Stayed Pending Settlement in Action in Illinois

Morrison v. Berry
Publication Date: 2020-01-15
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Food and Beverage | Investments and Investment Advisory | Retail
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris and Christopher P. Quinn, Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Randall J. Baron and Christopher H. Lyons, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA for plaintiff.
For defendant: Rudolf Koch, Matthew D. Perri and John M. O’Toole, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Adam L. Sisitsky, Lavinia M. Weizel, Robert I. Bodian and Scott A. Rader, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York, NY and Boston, MA for independent director defendants. William B. Chandler III, Bradley D. Sorrels, Lindsay K. Faccenda and Daniyal M. Iqbal, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE for defendant Duggan. Patricia L. Enerio, Jamie L. Brown and Gillian L. Andrews, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzell LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant Anicetti. Kevin G. Abrams, J. Peter Shindel, Jr. and Matthew L. Miller, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew A. Schwartz and Joshua S. Levy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY for J.P. Morgan defendants. William M. Lafferty, S. Mark Hurd, Thomas W. Briggs, Jr., Richard Li and Elizabeth A. Mullin, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stuart W. Gold and Richard W. Clary, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY for defendant Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. Kevin R. Shannon, Matthew F. Davis and Nicholas S. Prust, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jonathan Rosenberg and Abby F. Rudzin, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY for Apollo defendants. John L. Reed, Peter H. Kyle and David Clarke, Jr., DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE and Washington, DC for Berry defendants.
Case number: D68842

The court granted defendant directors' motions to dismiss.

Donnelly v. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-11-06
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer, and David M. Sborz, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington DE; Randall J. Baron, David. T. Wissbroecker, Christopher H. Lyons, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA and Nashville, TN for plaintiff.
For defendant: David E. Ross and S. Michael Sirkin, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter L. Welsh, Christian Reigstad, and Mary Zhou, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York NY for defendant.
Case number: D68759

Stockholder demonstrated entitlement to a Section 220 inspection by alleging facts sufficient to raise an inference that company used their control position to extract a unique benefit from the merger to support stockholder's claim of breach of fiduciary duties.

Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Publication Date: 2019-11-06
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Jack Weinstein
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff D. Joseph Kurtz: Mark S. Reich, Vincent Serra, Magdalene Economou Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Melville, NY. For Plaintiff Anthony Belfiore: Lester L. Levy, Matthew Insley-Pruitt, Sean M. Zaroogian Wolf Popper LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation: Eamon Paul Joyce, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY. Kara L. McCall, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL. For Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation: James M. Bergin, Adam J. Hunt, Morison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY. Brian R. Matsui, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company: Harold P. Weinberger, Eileen M. Patt, Ryan Gander, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY. Cortlin H. Lannin, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, CA.
Case number: 14-CV-1142

Court Certifies Class of Consumers Who Allege That 'Flushable' Wipes Are Not Flushable

Appellate Division, First Department: March 12, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-03-13
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: March 12, 2019

February 06, 2019 | Litigation Daily

Daily Dicta: Wait, What? Opposing Counsel Latham and Robbins Geller Both Claim They Won Puma Securities Trial

It's not uncommon for winners and losers to spin the results of a jury verdict, but rarely will two sides offer flatly contradictory takes on what went down.
6 minute read
February 06, 2019 | The Recorder

Wait, What? Opposing Counsel Latham and Robbins Geller Both Claim They Won Puma Securities Trial

It's not uncommon for winners and losers to spin the results of a jury verdict, but rarely will two sides offer flatly contradictory takes on what went down.
6 minute read
Teamsters Local 404 Health Servs. & Ins. Plan v. King Pharm. Inc.
Publication Date: 2018-10-22
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Discovery
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Peter Hall
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Petitioner‐Appellee: David W. Mit-chell, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA, Michael Morris Buchman on the brief, Motley Rice LLC, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Petitioner‐Appellee: David W. Mit-chell, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA, Michael Morris Buchman on the brief, Motley Rice LLC, New York, NY.
Case number: 16-791-cv

CPLR §3102(c) Discovery Petition Is Not a 'Civil Action' Removeable to Federal Court

APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Publication Date: 2018-10-15
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now