0 results for''Richards, Layton & Finger, PA''
You can use
to get even better search results
Averon US, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.
Publication Date: 2024-03-26Practice Area:Intellectual Property
Industry:Software |
Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of DelawareJudge: District Judge HughesAttorneys:For plaintiff: Tracy L. Pearson, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Wilmington, DE; Joseph Diamante, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, New York, NY; Raymond Jones, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Leesburg, VA; William Flachsbart, Mark Magas, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.For defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jason James Rawnsley, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; David S. Almeling, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA; Timothy S. Durst, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Dallas, TX for defendants.Case number: 1:22-cv-01341-TMH
Court declined to dismiss trade secret claims where the parties' contracts could be reasonably interpreted to impose a duty of confidentiality upon defendant to protect plaintiff's disclosed proprietary technology.
Magnolia Med. Tech., Inc. v. Kurin, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-08-21Practice Area:Patent Litigation
Industry:Health Care |
Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of DelawareJudge: District Judge ConnollyAttorneys:For plaintiff: Rodger Dallery Smith II, Anthony David Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ashok Ramani, David J. Lisson, Micah G. Block, Ian Hogg, Serge A. Voronov, Davis Polk & Wardell LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Kathryn B. Bi, Alena Farber, Davis Polk & Wardell LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.For defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Nicole Kathleen Pedi, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Catherine Nyarady, Kripa Raman, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY; Nicholas Groombridge, Groombridge, Wu, Baughman & Stone LLP, New York, NY; Jonathan Hangartner, X-Patents, APC, La Jolla, CA for defendant.Case number: 19-97-CFC
Court stayed motion for judgment of indefiniteness where plaintiff's expert described claim limitation as functional despite court construing it as structural, potentially giving defendant a viable argument in support of a motion for judgment as a matter of law of noninfringement.
Ajay Endeavors, Inc. v. Divvymed, LLC
Publication Date: 2023-04-11Practice Area:Contracts
Industry:E-Commerce |
Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of DelawareJudge: District Judge BibasAttorneys:For plaintiff: Kathleen M. Miller, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Massimo D’Angelo, Akerman LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.For defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Christine Dealy Haynes, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Christopher Andrews, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants.Case number: 20-cv-1556-SB
Unilateral mistake claim not dismissed where plaintiffs plausibly alleged they were unaware of defendants' failure to amend the parties' contract as agreed and that defendants knew of plaintiffs' mistake.
Nexstar Media Inc. v. Spectrum Mgmt. Holding Co., LLC
Publication Date: 2022-01-25Practice Area:Telecommunications
Industry:Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of DelawareJudge: District Judge BibasAttorneys:For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss, Daniel John McBride, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mitchell A. Kamin, Mark Chen, Covington & Burling LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Lindsay Barnhart, Covington & Burling LLP, Palo Alto, CA for plaintiff.For defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Howard J. Symons, Jenner & Block LLP, New York, NY; Megan B. Poetzel, Lina R. Powell, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.Case number: D69691
Federal court lacked federal jurisdiction over breach of contract claim where FCC antitrust regulations were not sufficiently substantial enough to the case to warrant the exercise of jurisdiction.
Data Engine Techs. LLC v. Google LLC
Publication Date: 2019-12-25Practice Area:Patent Litigation
Industry:Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of DelawareJudge: District Judge StarkAttorneys:For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wimington, DE; Amir Alavi,, Demetrios Anaipakos, Alisa A. Lipski, Timothy Shelby, Scott W. Clark, Monica Uddin, Nathan Campbell, and Louis Liao, Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing, P.C., Houston, TX for plaintiffs.For defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell and Jason J. Rawnsley, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Gregory P. Stone, Eric P. Tuttle, Zachary M. Briers, Hannah Dubina, Ashley D. Kaplan and Peter A. Detre, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA for defendants.Case number: D68816
Court ruled that a preamble term was limiting because it was essential to understand the remaining terms in the claim, and accepted defendant's proposed construction where the intrinsic evidence required construing the term as requiring a mathematical relationship.
Capone v. LDH Mgmt Holdings LLC
Publication Date: 2018-05-09Practice Area:Corporate Entities
Industry:Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of ChanceryJudge: Vice Chancellor GlasscockAttorneys:For plaintiff: Daniel A. Dreisbach and Ryan P. Durkin, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE; Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., Stephen L. Urbanczyk, Paul Mogin, Steven M. Cady, and Matthew H. Blumenstein, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for plaintiffsFor defendant: Donald J. Wolfe, Jr., T. Brad Davey, and Seth R. Tangman, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew Ditchfield, David B. Toscano, Edward Fu, and Sagar D. Thakur, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for defendants.Case number: D68134
Cancellation certificate nullified where LLC failed to set aside reserve for viable, non-frivolous claims that it had knowledge of.
Duffy v. Delaware State Univ.
Publication Date: 2018-01-17Practice Area:Labor Law
Industry:Education
Court: U.S. District Court of DelawareJudge: District Judge AndrewsAttorneys:For plaintiff: Mahala Duffy, pro se plaintiffFor defendant: Jennifer C. Bebko Jauffret and Lori Ann Brewington, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendant.Case number: D68006
Employment discrimination complaint dismissed where plaintiff mailed her complaint to the court for filing on the 90th day after receipt of her right to sue letter, such that the complaint was filed beyond the 90-day period following receipt of a right to sue letter.
A Delaware federal judge on Monday dismissed a derivative shareholder lawsuit challenging the U.S. government's ability to seize all of the quarterly profits generated by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after the companies' bailout in the financial crisis.
16 minute read
A Delaware federal judge on Friday postponed a key hearing on motions to dismiss a lawsuit by the survivors of the deadly Feb. 1 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, after an attorney for two former governors said the parties were actively pursuing talks in the case.
6 minute read
DebugScreen: mobile
Query
Results
TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.