0 results for ''Kaye Scholer''
Will Cahill's Brand Save It From the Modern Big Law Environment?
The firm is smaller in partnership than most of its peers and lacks extensive practice diversification. "Is there a place for a 400-person firm in Big Law?" said an Am Law 50 chair.
'Palpable' Uncertainty: Supreme Court Asked to Review Cellphone Searches at the Border
Among the courts that have opined on cellphone searches is U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York, who held that "phone searches at the border generally require warrants outside exigent circumstances."
'Palpable' Uncertainty: Supreme Court Asked to Review Cellphone Searches at the Border
An immigration lawyer says Border Patrol's warrantless searches of his phone violate the Fourth Amendment.
Arnold & Porter Lures 6-Lawyer Trial Team From Shook Hardy
The group has represented clients in the medical device, tobacco and pharmaceutical industries, among others, in pretrial litigation and as trial and appellate counsel.
Finalists Announced for The National Law Journal Legal Awards 2023
We are pleased to unveil the finalists and honorees for The National Law Journal Legal Awards highlighting the top litigation and appellate work from the past year.
Bad Laws? Texas Attorneys Are Fighting 6 Bills Set to Take Effect This Week
"There should be no mistake here: H.B. 2127's clear target is effective repeal of constitutional home rule itself," City of Houston attorney Collyn Ann Peddie said.
In Re: Proton Pump Inhibitors Prod. Liab. Litig.
Publication Date: 2023-08-28 Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Manufacturing |
Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delaware Superior Court Judge: Judge Davis Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas G. Macauley, Macauley LLC, Wilmington, DE; Martin Bienstock, Bienstock PLLC, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff. For defendant: James J. Freebery, Daniel J. Brown, Makenzie Windfelder, Hayley J. Reese, Chelsea A. Botsch, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Arthur E. Brown, William Hoffman, Matthew Douglas, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY; Amy K. Fisher, Katherine D. Althoff, Carolyn E. Riggs, Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, IN; Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sherry Knutson, Tucker Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL; Craig A. Thompson, Venable LLP, Baltimore, MD for defendants. Case number: N17C-07-001 PPI
Plaintiff brought the underlying personal injury action against defendants alleging that defendants were responsible for developing, manufacturing, marketing, and distributing proton pump inhibitor products that were unsafe, defectively designed, lacked proper warnings, and were unfit to be marketed and sold in the United States. Defendants individually and collectively moved to dismiss the claims. Plaintiff brought the case as administrator of a health care plan directly and as subrogee of its members' claims for a variety of injurie
Corporate Counsel Announces Its 2023 Women, Influence and Power in Law Awards!
These outstanding women will be recognized at an awards dinner on Oct. 18 as part of our Women, Influence & Power in Law Conference in New Orleans.
In Re: Proton Pump Inhibitors Prod. Liab. Litig.
Publication Date: 2023-08-21 Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Manufacturing |
Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge: Judge Davis Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas G. Macauley, Macauley LLC, Wilmington, DE; Martin Bienstock, Bienstock PLLC, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff. For defendant: James J. Freebery, Daniel J. Brown, Makenzie Windfelder, Hayley J. Reese, Chelsea A. Botsch, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Arthur E. Brown, William Hoffman, Matthew Douglas, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY; Amy K. Fisher, Katherine D. Althoff, Carolyn E. Riggs, Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, IN; Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sherry Knutson, Tucker Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL; Craig A. Thompson, Venable LLP, Baltimore, MD for defendants. Case number: N17C-07-001 PPI
Plaintiff brought the underlying personal injury action against defendants alleging that defendants were responsible for developing, manufacturing, marketing, and distributing proton pump inhibitor products that were unsafe, defectively designed, lacked proper warnings, and were unfit to be marketed and sold in the United States. Defendants individually and collectively moved to dismiss the claims. Plaintiff brought the case as administrator of a health care plan directly and as subrogee of its members' claims for a variety of injurie
Big Law Steps in as Scrutiny of Employers' DEI Programs Grows: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Vaishali Rao, Hinshaw & Culbertson Partner 1 minute read
Resources
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now