Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Holland & Knight LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
Appellate Division, First Department:June 4, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-06-08
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department:June 4, 2020

River Valley Ingredients, LLC v. Am. Proteins, Inc.
Publication Date: 2020-05-20
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman and Sarah T. Andrade, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edward S. Sledge IV, Whitt Steineker, Zachary A. Madonia, Hillary C. Campbell and K. Laney Gifford, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; J. Allen Maines, Caroline Johnson Tanner, A. André Hendrick, Matthew D. Friedlander, Patrick B. Reagin and Jacquelyn Thomas Watts, Holland & Knight LLP, Atlanta, GA for defendants.
Case number: D68987

Defendants were bound by a forum selection clause in an asset purchase agreement, so the court granted plaintiffs' motion to remand the case to state court.

Pharmacy Corp. of Am./Askari Consol. Litig.
Publication Date: 2020-05-06
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Goddess, Cooch & Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Brian C. Dunning, Dunning Rievman & Davies LLP, New York, NY; James Sawyer, Dunning Rievman & Davies LLP, Jericho, NY for Kaveh Askari and Onco 360 parties. Brett D. Fallon, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE ; Christopher G. Kelly, Stosh Silivos, Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy M. Sternberg, Holland & Knight LLP, Boston, MA for Pharmacy Corp. parties.
For defendant:
Case number: D68972

The court denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, because they did not demonstrate that an increase in a working capital loan constituted a "major decision" under the terms of their agreements.

April 29, 2020 | Law.com

Emerging Technology and How to Effectively Tune Out the Noise to Find What Works for Your Department

[On-Demand] Join this webcast to take a better look at what kind of technology options are available, how to take advantage of them, and how to best implement them successfully in your legal department.
4 minute read
Appellate Division, First Department: February 27, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-03-02
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: February 27, 2020

City of Atlanta et al. v. Atlanta Independent School System
Publication Date: 2020-02-28
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Government
Industry: Education | State and Local Government
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Benham
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Emmet J. Bondurant, II, David Gregory Hill Brackett Robert Lawrence Ashe, III, (Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, LLP), Atlanta, Jeffrey Spencer Haymore, (Dillard Sellers, LLC), Atlanta, Susan Marie Garrett, Nina Hickson, (City of Atlanta Law Department), Atlanta, Robert Sparks Highsmith, Jr., (Holland & Knight LLP), Atlanta, Joseph Daniel Young, (Joseph D. Young, P.C.), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Richard H. Sinkfield, Michael L. Eber, Rachel Mary Bishop, Cameron Blaine Roberts, (Rogers & Hardin LLP), Atlanta, appellee.
Case number: S19A1203

Dispute Between City of Atlanta and Atlanta School System Not Ripe For Review

Appellate Division,First Department: February 25, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-02-27
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division,First Department: February 25, 2020

Appellate Division, First Department: January 23, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-01-27
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: January 23, 2020

Appellate Division, First Department: January 16, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-01-21
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: January 16, 2020

December 06, 2019 | New York Law Journal

New Legislation Opens Floodgates to Formerly Time-Barred Sex Harassment Claims

New York's new legislation, signed into law in August 2019 and effective February 2020, extends the statute of limitations from one to three years for complainants seeking redress regarding workplace sexual harassment claims.
3 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources