0 results for '10b-5'
'Materiality' in America and Abroad
In this edition of their Corporate Governance column, discuss a bedrock feature of American securities law and regulation—materiality. They write that the working definition of materiality in the United States, which has served corporate America well for nearly nine decades, now finds itself facing significant pressures from a variety of sources.SLUSA's 'In Connection With' Requirement
In his Corporate Litigation column, Joseph McLaughlin discusses the recent Ninth Circuit decision in 'Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co.,' which reversed a SLUSA dismissal of state law fiduciary claims last month, illustrating that particularly in fee-related cases the line between federal securities law claims and state law claims remains inexact.'Spoofing' Prosecutions: The DOJ's Approach
In recent years, DOJ has aggressively pursued spoofing cases under the wire fraud statute and 2020 saw significant developments in this area, including conviction after trial of two commodities traders in September 2020.For Civil Enforcement, the Pandemic Is Just Beginning
There have been many criminal prosecutions of COVID-related fraud—the DOJ recently announced that the Fraud Section has criminally charged at least 120 defendants to date in fraud cases involving the PPP—but those often alleged egregious misconduct. Two new end-of-year settlements go beyond such incidents of egregious wrongdoing, however, and shed greater light on how the government might pursue civil enforcement for companies whose behavior was grey, sloppy, or pushed boundaries, which William Harrington, Annie Railton and Melissa Brumer discuss in this Federal Civil Enforcement column.'Predominantly Foreign' Securities Claims
In their Second Circuit Review , Martin Flumenbaum and Brad Karp discuss 'Cavello Bay Reinsurance v. Shubin Stein,' an opinion which "continues the Second Circuit's trend of taking a narrow approach to the extraterritorial reach of the federal securities laws."4th Circuit: Market Risks Hindsight Is Not Enough to Support Securities Fraud Claim
Statements and omissions arising from legitimate, subjective business judgments that allegedly become misleading only with the benefit of hindsight are insufficient to create the "strong inference" of intent necessary to satisfy the heightened standard for pleading a securities fraud claim.Third Circ.: Bad Business Decisions, Without More, Do Not Constitute Federal Securities Fraud
When a public company discloses bad news, often its stock price declines and shareholders' investments similarly decline.Transparency in Corporate Political Spending and SEC Rule 14a-8
In the wake of the Jan. 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol, organizations from public companies to large financial institutions, and even law firms, are reconsidering their political contributions.Trending Stories
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now