Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Hollingsworth'

You can use to get even better search results
MHC Financing Limited Partnership v. City of San Rafael
Publication Date: 2013-04-17
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Vaughn R. Walker, District Judge, Presiding Before: Jerome Farris, Sidney R. Thomas, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David J. Bradford (argued), Barry Levenstam, Lisa T. Scruggs, and Bradley M. Yusim, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants­-Appellants.
For defendant: Michael von Loewenfeldt (argued) and James M. Wagstaffe, Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, San Francisco, California; Robert F. Epstein, Ragghianti Freitas LLP, San Rafael, California, for Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee-Appellee City of San Rafael. Gordon C. Atkinson (argued), Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant-Cross-Appellee-Appellee Contempo Marin Homeowners Association. R.S. Radford, Pacific Legal Foundation Sacramento, California, for Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundation. Elliot L. Bien and Amy E. Margolin, Bien & Summers, Novato, California, for Amicus Curiae Western Manufactured Housing Association. Andrew W. Schwartz, Fran M. Layton, Matthew D. Zinn, and Amanda R. Garcia, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP, San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties. Bruce E. Stanton, Law Offices of Bruce E. Stanton, San Jose, California, for Amicus Curiae Golden State Manufactured-Home Owners' League, Inc.
Case number: No. 07-15982 No. 09-16447 No. 09-16451 No. 09-16612 No. 09-16613

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3839MHC FINANCING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois limited partnership; GRAPELAND VISTAS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff

November 07, 2005 |

Reinstatements of Attorneys

Notice to the bar.
8 minute read
Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms
Publication Date: 2010-06-21
Practice Area: Government
Industry:
Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No. 09-475

MONSANTO COMPANY, et al., PETITIONERS v. GEERTSON SEED FARMS et al. No. 09-475p class="jurisdic

November 16, 2005 |

Majid, petitioners-appellants v. Portuondo, respondents-appellees

Cross-Examination Bar Did Not Deprive Petitioners Of Fair �Batson� Hearing; Habeas Relief Denied
48 minute read
August 15, 2008 |

Premium Work

We researched the Fortune 100 to find out which law firms they used in 2007 in each of the following practice areas: corporate transactions, torts and negligence, commercial law and contracts litigation, employment and labor litigation, and intellectual property. Companies are listed in alphabetical order.
43 minute read
August 15, 2008 |

We researched the fortune 100 to find Out which law firms they used in 2007 in each of the following practice areas: corporate transactions, torts and negligence, commercial law and contracts litigation, employment and labor litigation, and intellectual property. Companies are listed in alphabetical order.
44 minute read
Doe v. Reed
Publication Date: 2010-06-24
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No. 09–559

JOHN DOE #1, et al., PETITIONERS v. SAM REED, WASHINGTON SECRETARY OF STATE, et al. No. 09&ndash

September 20, 2007 |

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

Notice to the bar.
400 minute read
Pickup v. Brown
Publication Date: 2013-08-29
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding William B. Shubb, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, and Susan P. Graber, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Mathew D. Staver (argued) and Anita L. Staver, Liberty Counsel, Maitland, Florida; Mary E. McAlister, Stephen M. Crampton, and Daniel J. Schmid, Liberty Counsel, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Plaintiffs-Appellants David H. Pickup et al.
For defendant: Alexandra Robert Gordon (argued), Deputy Attorney General, Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Douglas J. Woods, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tamar Pachter, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Daniel J. Powell and Rei R. Onishi, Deputy Attorneys General, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellees Edmund G. Brown, Jr., et al. Shannon P. Minter (argued), National Center for Lesbian Rights, San Francisco, California; David C. Dinielli, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Intervenor/Defendant-Appellee.
Case number: No. 12-17681 No. 13-15023

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 9617 DAVID H. PICKUP; CHRISTOPHER H. ROSICK; JOSEPH NICOLOSI; ROBERT VAZZO; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND THERAPY OF HOMOS

Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Co.
Publication Date: 2010-09-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 6th Cir.
Judge: Sutton, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: Nos. 08-4015/4016

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: November 18, 2009Before: MARTIN and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; REEVES, District Judge.*

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now