0 results for 'Netherlands'
Ponzi Schemes 101: Don't Be the Next Victim
Yes, it's true, there are some David Letterman-style Top Ten lists that are more fun than this one on avoiding Ponzi and pyramid schemes. But that doesn't mean that corporate counsel really, really shouldn't read this one ...Does the Bribery Act Make the U.K. the New Sheriff in Town?
OK, GCs, just what you want: How to get out of it — welcome to Dodge City, old chap.Health-care law's demise may permit best plan
Forcing people to buy health insurance (or pay a fine) may be the death knell for President Barack Obama's plan to cover the nation's uninsured.Bridging the Gap: How In-House Counsel Can Cut Budgets While Law Firms Can Increase Profits
'What can I do to win your business?' That's right, law firms, beg me, beg me to send my money flowing your firm's way. Well, maybe there's a way that in-house counsel can cut budgets while law firms increase profits ... maybe.• ALSO SEE: Start Your Engines! | Expert Archive • Get Out of It — Welcome to Dodge City, Old Chap • All Right, GCs ... Let's Get UNIFIED!!!The Secret to Sandy? Be Prepared
Unlike California earthquakes, hurricanes announce their travel plans in advance, giving the legal technology community time to clean the house for the arrival. A quick poll shows that, so far, law firms, vendors, and other legal professionals aren't too worried about Mother Nature's latest challenge.Court Declines to Transfer Case From Eastern District of Texas
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has added to its growing body of case law about the grounds for transferring patent infringement cases. In a Dec. 15 unanimous order in In Re Vistaprint Ltd. and OfficeMax Inc., the court departed from a recent appellate trend of ordering cases transferred from the plaintiff-friendly Eastern District of Texas; it affirmed the lower court judge's denial of Vistaprint and OfficeMax's transfer bid.But the ruling wasn't all good news for Samsung. San Jose federal district court judge Lucy Koh found that Apple was likely to prove at trial that Samsung infringed three iPhone patents. Still, she refused to issue an injunction because Apple hadn't shown that it would lose market share, customers or goodwill absent the injunction. The judge also questioned the validity of an iPad patent.
Trending Stories
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now