0 results for 'Edelman'
Judge in the Hot Seat: JQC Moves to Block Effort to Dismiss Ethics Charges
The defense argued that because "the clear meaning of 'habitual intemperance' is repeated public intoxication not spoken words," the judge's conduct failed to amount to habitual intemperance.Playing Sexually Derogatory Music at Work Can Constitute Sex Discrimination, 9th Circuit Rules
"Although we have not before addressed the specific issue of music-as-harassment, this court and our sister circuits have recognized Title VII redress for other auditory offenses in the workplace and for derogatory conduct to which all employees are exposed," the court said.Pfizer and Moderna Sued for Patent Infringement Over mRNA Technology Used in COVID-19 Vaccine
This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.'You're Grumpy and Not Nice': Does the JQC Have Grounds for This Judge's Removal?
Defense counsel for Middle Judicial Circuit Chief Judge Robert S. Reeves motioned to dismiss 43 of 58 counts of ethics charges brought by the Judicial Qualifications Commission of Georgia.The Law Firm Disrupted: What Extreme Profit Margins Tell Us About the Am Law 200
The Second Hundred is home to some outliers with distinct business models that aren't about to be seen in the Am Law 100 anytime soon.View more book results for the query "Edelman"
Georgia Law Firms Continue to Climb Am Law 200 Rankings
Atlanta-based firms in the Am Law Second Hundred outpaced their peers in several metrics.NY Court of Appeals Says Jury Can Hear Fatal Security Negligence Cases Against NYC Housing Authority
Chief Judge Rowan Wilson wrote that landlords in New York "have a common-law duty to take minimal precautions to protect tenants from foreseeable harm, including a third party's foreseeable criminal conduct."Judge Rules Tiger Woods' Ex-Girlfriend Must Abide by NDA
Circuit Judge Elizabeth Metzger rejected Erica Herman's attempt to quash the 2017 agreement by saying Tiger Woods had committed sexual harassment against her, calling Herman's allegations "vague and threadbare."Nevada High Court: Out-of-State Plaintiffs Are Considered 'Foreign' for Forum Selection Purposes
"Accordingly, we hold that a sister-state-resident plaintiff should be treated as 'foreign' for the purposes of a forum non conveniens analysis and thus be afforded less deference in her choice of forum, unless she proves that Nevada is a convenient forum by showing bona fide connections to Nevada," the court said. "However, we do not resolve whether this case has bona fide connections to Nevada, given that we conclude C.R. England and Alamin did not meet their evidentiary burden."Trending Stories
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now