0 results for 'Hodgson Russ'
Barcalo Manufacturing Co. v. Firemen's Mut. Ins. Co.
Barcalo Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff, v. Firemen's Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant263 N.Y.S.2d 807Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division…Optimistic Expectations Are Playing Out, But Struggles Linger
Christine Simmons, a New York Law Journal reporter, writes: A quarter of the way into 2014, several leading New York attorneys said their firms are on target for promising returns this year. But a recent string of firm layoffs coupled with constant rate pressure are reminders of the continuing struggles in the legal industry.Property Tax Tips for Nonprofits
Lawyer for a nonprofit group? The tax terrain is no less complicated for you than a corporation.Court Reverses Itself in Malpractice Insurance Ruling
The state Court of Appeals conceded Tuesday that it erred in a June 2013 ruling and reversed itself, determining that an insurer could try to prove in court that a lawyer's malpractice insurance policy did not cover a $3 million loss.Ruling Reinstates Whistleblower Suit Against DHL
A federal notice provision requiring challenges in shipping-rate disputes to be brought within 180 days is trumped by the False Claims Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second held Wednesday.Casinos Are Coming! Well, Not So Fast
Hodgson Russ partner Robert J. McLaughlin discusses the road map created by the governor and the Legislature to bring the "dream" of casino gaming to the Empire State, which many have been waiting more than 40 years for, and when it will occur.Making Disclaimer Work for Minors
Darcy M. Katris and Emelia G. Short of Hodgson Russ write: Both New York's EPTL §2-1.11 and Internal Revenue Code §2518 permit an individual to disclaim an interest in property transferred to him or her if certain conditions are met. Although the conditions in the EPTL and IRC are similar in many respects, there are some differences. For example, the treatment of minors as disclaimants is more liberal under the IRC than under the EPTL.Circuit Sees 'Intimate Association' Right in Engagement
A divided Second Circuit made new law by interpreting a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision to recognize an "intimate association right in betrothal" in a case where a white man claimed he was fired from his job because he had become engaged to, and was living with, a black woman.Trending Stories
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now