0 results for 'Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Limited'
UCC Article 4A: Displacing Common-Law Tort Claims
Michael J. Friedman, a partner in Winston & Strawn, writes that three recent decisions in New York and Florida have shed new light on the question of whether customers challenging their banks' processing of unauthorized wire transfers are confined to the liability rules of Article 4A of the Uniform Commercial Code, or may also bring separate common-law tort claims.Briar Patch Ltd. v. Phoenix Pictures Inc.
Complete Preemption Doctrine Does Not Allow Federal Court to Decide Unpleaded ClaimsRecent Developments in Employee Restrictive Covenant Law
In his column for CLI, Roy W. Breitenbach of Garfunkel Wild in Great Neck writes about how the law regarding employee restrictive covenants in New York is ever-changing.Heerwagen, plaintiff-appellant v. Clear Channel Communications, defendants-appellees
Monopolization Claims Against Concert Promoter Denied Class Certification; Ticket Market Is LocalView more book results for the query "Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Limited"
Supreme Court Tackles Patentability of Scientific Phenomena
In a dispute that tests the scope of patentability, the Supreme Court seemed reluctant Tuesday to decide a key case in a way that would establish what Justice Stephen Breyer called "monopolies in this country beyond belief" over naturally occurring phenomena. Laboratory Corp. of America v. Metabolite could help resolve a festering legal debate over whether a basic scientific phenomenon can be patented -- and, by extension, whether business strategies or other less tangible creations can be patented.Cite as: Newman v. Family Management Corporation, 08 Civ. 11215, NYLJ 1202474183030, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 20, 2010)District Judge Leonard B. Sandp
Holmes, plaintiffs-appellants v. Grubman, defendants-appellees
Georgia High Court Must Decide Issues Arising From Decision to Hold, Not Sell, WorldCom StockWhat's Left of 'Luckie'? Court or Arbitrator and Timeliness Issues
Julia A. Cort, principal court attorney for Justice Joan A. Madden of the Supreme Court, New York County and an adjunct law professor at New York Law School, analyzes the issue of whether a court or an arbitrator decides timeliness questions when an agreement to arbitrate is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act.Trending Stories
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now