0 results for 'JAMS'
Is ChatGPT Ready for Its Day in Court? Experts Say No Way
While ChatGPT has legitimate potential uses in the legal industry, recent proposals that amount to having the technology practice law on behalf of clients are a step too far in the mind of legal experts.Strategies for Effectively Selecting the Right Arbitrator
With little ability to overturn an arbitrator's award, it is critical that you select an arbitrator right for your case and client.Considerations in Using an Expert in Resolving IP Cases Through ADR
ADR can be more efficient in terms of saving time versus taking a case to trial. Intellectual property cases are no exception, and ADR processes—which may also allow for emergency or temporary relief—can provide relief from extensive court backlogs.View more book results for the query "JAMS"
High Arbitration Costs and Confidentiality Burden Claims Against Bad Investment Advisers
The Wall Street Journal recently ran an article on the high arbitration costs associated with recovering losses from investment advisers. The crux of Jason Zweig's article was captured in its subheading—"Battling with a financial adviser who has wronged you is wildly expensive—and the fight will almost certainly happen in secret. That needs to change."Sanctions in Commercial Arbitration
As a matter of practice, arbitrators rarely impose sanctions, although sometimes the need arises. This article discusses the tools arbitrators can use to respond to sanctionable behavior in arbitration.Suit: U.S. Ship Canal Dredging in Summer Threatens Sea Turtles
For two years, environmentalists have battled an effort by the Army Corps of Engineers to end a policy that for three decades limited to winter months the dredging of accumulated sand and mud from harbors in Georgia and the Carolinas.Mediating Technology Disputes: The Why and the How
Expediency is key in resolving technology-related disputes, given the fast pace of the tech industry. according to Barbara Reeves, a mediator, arbitrator and special master with JAMS.In First-Impression Case, Maryland High Court Defines 'Definite Proof' in Workers' Comp Act
In a case of first impression, the Court of Appeals of Maryland determined that the phrase "definite proof" in the state's Workers' Compensation Act applies to the quality of evidence a claimant must submit as part of their burden of production.Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now