0 results for 'Morris Nichols Arsht Tunnell LLP'
2014 Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection PHV & MJP Ineligible Lists
Notice to the bar.Settlement Ends Trade Secrets Case Against McKinsey Duo
After repeatedly touting its lawsuit against two former executives who departed for McKinsey & Co., turnaround consultancy AlixPartners and its lawyers at Gibson Dunn quietly settled the case.Acacia Unit Socked with Fees in Alcatel Patent Fight
A judge in Delaware agreed with Alcatel-Lucent's lawyers at Goodwin Procter that the plaintiff, an Acacia subsidiary called Chalumeau Power Systems, filed a frivolous lawsuit and backed off only after Alcatel refused to negotiate a settlement.Liggett Group, Inc. v. ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company
LIGGETT GROUP INC. and BROOKE GROUP HOLDING, INC., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY…In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation
IN RE ORACLE CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION824 A.2d 917COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE NEW CASTLECONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 18751 | June 13, 2003, Decided…Third Circuit Dismisses Viacom Executive Compensation Suit
Corporations can define shareholder voting rights by setting limits on certain classes of stock, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled. Although the issue had been long settled in Delaware corporate law, the appellate court's precedential decision adopts the regulation as federal law.Third Circuit Dismisses Viacom Executive Compensation Suit
Corporations can define shareholder voting rights by setting limits on certain classes of stock, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled. Although the issue had been long settled in Delaware corporate law, the appellate court's precedential decision adopts the regulation as federal law.District Court Applies Chancery Precedent to Dismiss Compensation Suits
The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware applied Court of Chancery precedent to dismiss two shareholder lawsuits filed against the boards of ConocoPhillips Co. and Allergan Inc. In both cases, shareholders alleged that the corporations wasted resources by approving employee compensation plans, but the federal court dismissed the litigation because the shareholders had not made a demand on the board prior to initiating the lawsuits.Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now