Search Results

0 results for 'Ford Motor Service Company'

You can use to get even better search results
December 21, 2009 |

2009 Timeline

Highlights of the news of the 2009 Texas legal scene.
20 minute read
March 04, 2010 |

Daily Decision Service Alert: Vol. 19, No. 42 - March 4 2010

Daily decision alert.
15 minute read
January 11, 2005 |

D.C. Firms Make Lower-Key Inauguration Day Plans

Second inaugurations are often quieter, but there are other considerations this year as well. Yet despite concerns about security and other issues -- ranging from the war in Iraq to tense partisanship -- many firms say they will host parties, even if it means logistical headaches, additional planning and an attempt at understatement amid all of the pomp.
8 minute read
October 15, 2002 |

Howrey Simon's Hope

All of a sudden, Washington, D.C.-based Howrey Simon Arnold & White is on the map in the San Francisco Bay Area. The firm made a big splash when it hired top patent litigator Henry Bunsow from Keker & Van Nest to launch the new outpost, and it's aggressively recruiting more top talent. The firm faces intense competition, but Howrey Simon thinks it has a model that might set it apart from the pack.
8 minute read
March 10, 2003 |

Several Big Cases Fizzle at High Court

Tony [email protected] with affirmative action, gay rights, cross burning and possibly campaign finance reform on its docket, this likely will be remembered as one of the Supreme Court's most important terms in recent history.It also may be memorable for yielding the smallest number of written opinions in the modern era.
8 minute read
May 09, 2006 |

Judicial Profile: Kathryn Mickle Werdegar

The state Supreme Court justice strikes a moderate chord with articulate rulings that focus on personal issues that affect everyday life.
9 minute read
March 15, 2013 |

Capitol Report

A round-up of action from Trenton.
6 minute read
August 26, 2013 |

Strategies for Interlocutory Appeals in Class and Collective Employment Actions

Proskauer Rose partners Mark Harris and Mark Batten write: Rule 23(f) gives the federal courts of appeals discretion to provide interlocutory review of class certification decisions, while 28 U.S.C. §1292(b) allows for review of decisions on collective action status. Lawyers need to understand the rigorous rules governing these appeals under both Rule 23(f) and §1292(b).
11 minute read

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT