Search Results

0 results for 'Thompson Coburn'

You can use to get even better search results
November 12, 2007 |

The 2007 NLJ 250

6 minute read
July 07, 2009 |

The Layoff List: By the Numbers

Employment shifts at The Am Law 200, Global 100, and Other Firms of Note
20 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

To find out how Midlevel associates rate their firms as workplaces, our annual midlevel survey examined 12 areas that contribute to job satisfaction. They include relations with partners and other associates, the interest and satisfaction level asso-ciates have in their work, training and guidance, policy on billables, management openness about firm strategies and partnership chances, the firm?s attitude toward pro bono work, compensation and benefits, and the respondents? inclination to stay at their firm for at least two more years. Respondents graded their firms on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score. On this chart, firms with ten or more responses are ranked by their averages on those questions. Averages include responses from all participating of-fices. For definitions of national and international firms, and for other details, see our methodology
20 minute read
November 10, 2011 |

Bar Exam Results July 2011

The Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners on Oct. 14 announced the results of the bar examination given on July 26 and 27, 2011.
17 minute read
September 30, 2002 |

Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection List of Ineligible Attorneys

Notice to the bar.
684 minute read
November 01, 2007 |

Corporate Fraud Data Base

32 minute read
January 26, 2003 |

Automobile Injury 2003: Digests of Unpublished Decisions

Automobile Injury 2003
242 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008 City

49 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read

Resources