0 results for 'Anderson Group Inc'
Same Lawyers, Different Day: Number of Firms Appearing at High Court Dwindles
Tony [email protected] last time Kenneth S. Geller argued more than two cases before the Supreme Court in a single term was 1985, when he was working in the solicitor general's office representing the government.But Geller argued three cases in the term that has just ended for the summer, and his partners at Mayer, Brown, Rowe Maw argued three more.Opinions Approved for Publication
State court opinions approved for publication.Deconstructing Service Level Agreements
ECHNOLOGY service agreements define the services to be provided, of course. Most go farther, and promise a specific level of performance and specific penalties if the promised level of services is not delivered (a service level agreement, or "SLA").9 Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story
Nothing can ensure complete and total accuracy of a spreadsheet, but taking nine careful steps and choosing a capable comparison software can go a long way towards getting it right. [MORE]Prominent Lawyers Got Special Treatment
Without waiting for someone to make a federal case of it, newly-installed Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers is moving ahead to open the docket sheets and sealing orders in several hundred civil and family cases in which everything except party names and a docket number are sealed.The Firestone Fiasco: Crisis Managers Tell What They'd Do
Bridgestone/Firestone and Ford appear to be caught with their pants down, with each day seeming to bring new and damning discoveries in the Firestone tire debacle. Crisis management experts point out how the companies' finger-pointing and stinginess with information have backfired, with one calling the unfolding drama "the perfect example of how not to handle a corporate crisis."Court of Chancery Comes Down Hard on Trading by Plaintiffs in Representative Litigation
Defendants in class and derivative litigation often view the plaintiffs in those cases, especially the repeat players whose names are familiar to devoted readers of Court of Chancery opinions, as minor investors with little directly at stake in the litigation. Sometimes, however, the plaintiffs have significant equity stakes in the companies whose transactions they seek to enjoin. In those cases, the plaintiffs may be sharp investors who value the investment more than the principle at stake. What happens, then, to these investors when they see the chances at success in litigation passing them by? In any other circumstance, they might be inclined to trade out of their position or arbitrage the risk appropriately. When, however, these investors have chosen to be the plaintiff in a case seeking to halt the challenged transaction, the ability to act like an ordinary investor is severely restricted.Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now