0 results for 'Mazda Motor'
Sarbanes-Oxley extends statute of limitations
The sarbanes-oxley act of 2002 contains some good news for investors. It extends the statute of limitations for securities claims to two years after the discovery of facts constituting the violation and to five years after the violation actually occurred. While time limits have been liberalized, the rules for applying these limits in individual cases remain a developing area of the law.Unpacking Interlocutory Jurisdiction
Interlocutory appeals are permitted in a wide variety of circumstances. But what happens to the rest of the case when an interlocutory appeal is pending? As Aaron S. Bayer writes, generally the district court retains jurisdiction over other aspects of the case, but the extent of the court's authority to act, and its discretion to stay further proceedings, depend greatly on the type of interlocutory appeal and the circumstances presented.Unpacking Interlocutory Jurisdiction
Interlocutory appeals are permitted in a wide variety of circumstances. But what happens to the rest of the case when an interlocutory appeal is pending? As Aaron S. Bayer writes, generally the district court retains jurisdiction over other aspects of the case, but the extent of the court's authority to act, and its discretion to stay further proceedings, depend greatly on the type of interlocutory appeal and the circumstances presented.Federal Opinion Approved for Publication
Federal court opinion approved for publication.Prosecutor settles civil suit following DUI crash
An assistant district attorney in Los Angeles has agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle a lawsuit brought by two women whose car she crashed into while driving drunk on California's Pacific Coast Highway, according to a lawyer for the two women.Docket Watch: Arguments at the Supreme Court
We run down cases up for argument at the U.S. Supreme Court in the weeks ahead.Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. Mendez
Appellees sued the appellant, a tire manufacturer, asserting that a tire on the vehicle failed due to a manufacturing defect that caused the tire's belt separation. The court affirms the trial court's judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now