Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Jones Walker'

You can use to get even better search results
Anilao v. Spota, 10-CV-00032 (JFB) (WDW)
Publication Date: 2011-04-07
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Joseph F. Bianco
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Plaintiffs are represented by James Druker of Kase & Druker, Esqs., Garden City, NY. Plaintiff Vinluan is also represented by Oscar Michelen of Cuomo LLC, South, Mineola, NY.
For defendant: The County defendants are represented by Brian C. Mitchell, Suffolk County Department of Law, County Attorney, Hauppauge, NY. The Sentosa defendants are represented by Sarah C. Lichtenstein of Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Flowers, Greenberg & Eisman, Lake Success, NY.
Case number: 10-CV-00032 (JFB) (WDW)

Cite as: Anilao v. Spota, 10-CV-00032 (JFB) (WDW), NYLJ 1202489219823, at *1 (EDNY, Decided March 31, 2011)District Judge Joseph F. Biancop class="decided"

February 20, 2007 |

Cal Law 25: Top Firms in the Golden State

The totals are in � we inaugurate the Cal Law 25 by ranking the biggest firms in the state, from Latham to Fenwick.
24 minute read
April 03, 2003 |

12 minute read
October 04, 2010 |

Newsmakers

3 minute read
February 01, 2007 |

PRO BONO SCORECARD 2007: Scoring the Firms

26 minute read
September 10, 2012 |

Big D and Diversity

According to a new Dallas Diversity Task Force report, the number of minority lawyers at the 20 largest Dallas firms has risen from 8.4 percent in 2006 to 11.94 percent in 2012.
7 minute read
September 28, 2009 |

Female Attorneys at Large Texas Firms

12 minute read
May 16, 2012 |

Judge nominations flow slowly from Obama.

President Barack Obama stands to become the first president in at least 30 years to have more openings on the federal bench at the end of his first term than when he started.
7 minute read
December 28, 2009 |

11th Circuit Nixes Sex Harassment Claims for Suggestive Talk

An 11th Circuit panel has ruled that two former male Home Depot employees do not have a sexual harassment claim against the company despite evidence that a male manager made comments suggesting he was sexually attracted to them and touched them in arguably inappropriate ways. Judges making up the panel majority issued a similar ruling in the case in July, before issuing a revised majority opinion, which suggests at least one of their colleagues may have expressed concerns about the earlier opinion.
7 minute read
August 02, 1999 |

Meet the 'Wilson, Sonsini of the South'

5 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

NEXT