0 results for 'New York Times Company'
Recovering Attorney Fees in Patent Litigation
Patent litigation can be bitter, and parties often engage in aggressive strategies. But those strategies can result in attorney fees being awarded, based on 35 USC �285 of the Patent Act, which reads: "The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party." As a result, two important questions arise: What constitutes an "exceptional" case prompting a court to consider an award of attorney fees, and when is a court likely to award attorney fees to a prevailing party?Sweatshop Case Settles for $20M
Three overseas sweatshop lawsuits involving dozens of the country's largest retailers and a 30,000-member class of garment workers have settled for $20 million. Abercrombie & Fitch, Target, Gap Inc. and J.C. Penney Co. are among the retailers and manufacturers that agreed Wednesday to settle suits alleging that factory workers on the U.S. commonwealth island of Saipan were subject to exploitative conditions.Judge Finds Efficiency in Class Certification for Suit Against Sears
In a concise eight-page decision issued on Nov. 13, Judge Richard Posner U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned a decision denying class certification in a moldy washer case against Sears Roebuck & Co., which sells Whirlpool machines.View more book results for the query "New York Times Company"
Decision summaries from the NLJ
Driving suspension valid only if reasonably based�and other decisions from The National Law Journal.Teflon Litigators Hope Class Action Sticks
Lawyers who represent potentially 10 million Teflon cookware users in federal multidistrict litigation against DuPont are hoping to make stick their claims that they should have been warned of the purported carcinogenic and respiratory hazards of toxic fumes released while using Teflon pots and pans at high temperatures. But first they must convince a federal judge in Iowa -- where 14 class actions were consolidated from 12 other states in February -- to grant class certification to the plaintiffs.Political loyalty v. the Fifth
Given that Cheney-staffer Lewis Libby�s indictment was all about answering questions on a highly charged foreign policy issue, the political considerations are obvious. But so too are the criminal implications. Anyone other than a high government official in Libby�s situation would clearly have been advised to invoke his Fifth Amendment right to silence.State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now