0 results for 'Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Limited'
Holmes, plaintiffs-appellants v. Grubman, defendants-appellees
Georgia High Court Must Decide Issues Arising From Decision to Hold, Not Sell, WorldCom StockScalp & Blade Inc. v. Advest Inc.
Scholarship Fund Claiming 'Churning' of Fund May Recover Market Index, Lost Profit or Lost AppreciationD.H. Blair & Co. Inc., plaintiffs-appellees v. Gottdiener, defendants-appellants
Florida Arbitral Award Confirmed; Investors� Florida Law Arguments Waived as Not Raised in SDNY ActionAsia Deal Digest: June 6, 2013
* Mori Hamada, Simpson Thacher on Suntory's $4.7 billion IPO * Latham leads Vedanta Resources' $1.7 billion bond issue * Allen & Gledhill advises Heineken subsidiary on entry into MyanmarView more book results for the query "Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Limited"
Removability of Federal Class Action Claims From State Court
In their Securities Law column, Jodi Kleinick, a partner at Paul Hastings, and Mor Wetzler, an associate at the firm, write that for decades, the volume of securities class actions has grown, and while initially most were filed in federal court, the number of securities class actions filed in state court has increased steadily and in 2010 surpassed the number of federal court filings.Opinions Approved for Publication
Federal and state court opinions approved for publication.State wage payment laws pose unique challenges
While there has been a recent boom in federal Fair Labor Standards Act litigation, another front on the wage-and-hour landscape has emerged: litigation arising from state wage payment statutes. As employers, employees and counsel are discovering, these statutes present their own set of unique protections, opportunities and challenges. The stakes for failing to comply can be very high.Keep an Eye on the End Game: Enforcement
Claudia T. Salomon, a partner at DLA Piper, and J.P. Duffy, a senior associate at the firm, write that the perception that New York Convention awards are virtually assured recognition in enforcement proceedings can cause practitioners to overlook critical enforcement issues that should be addressed at the time the arbitration clause is drafted, during the substantive arbitral proceedings, and during enforcement proceedings themselves. Failure to consider those issues can unnecessarily prolong enforcement proceedings and can, in the worst case scenario, render an award unenforceable and ineffective.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now