Search Results

0 results for 'Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
May 20, 2024 | Delaware Law Weekly

Morris Nichols Partner to Speak at 2024 NAST Treasury Management Training Symposium

The National Association of State Treasurers (NAST) hosts their annual Treasury Management Training Symposium in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, from Monday to Thursday, and Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell partner Donna Culver is set to speak.
2 minute read
May 14, 2024 | Delaware Law Weekly

Morris Nichols Partner to Present at 2024 TerraLex Asia Pacific Regional Meeting

TerraLex is scheduled to host a gathering in Singapore from Thursday through Saturday of member law firms from throughout the Asia-Pacific region and those from other regions that often serve clients in Asia-Pacific. Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell partner Eric Schwartz is set to present.
2 minute read
City of Sarasota Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Inovalon Holdings, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-05-13
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: E-Commerce | Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Ned Weinberger, Brendan W. Sullivan, Labaton Sucharow LLP, Wilmington, DE; John Vielandi, Labaton Sucharow LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy Friedman, David Tejtel, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, Bedford Hills, NY; Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, J. Daniel Albert, Geoffrey C. Jarvis, Grant D. Goodhart, III, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA for appellants.
For defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Kevin M. Gallagher, Craig K. Ferrere, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; William M. Lafferty, Ryan D. Stottmann, Alexandra M. Cumings, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Blair Connelly, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Kristin N. Murphy, Ryan A. Walsh, Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA for appellees.
Case number: 2022-0698

Court reversed dismissal of action challenging corporate acquisition where proxy statement failed to disclose advisors' conflicts of interest and erroneously described the advisors' roles in the transaction.

May 06, 2024 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Activision Owes Acceleration Bay $23.4M for Multiplayer Gaming Patent Infringement, Jury Says

The jury found Activision liable for $18 million for infringing in World of Warcraft and another $5.4 million for infringing in two Call of Duty games.
2 minute read
May 01, 2024 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Del. Supreme Court Unanimously Grants Another Shareholder Win Over Pre-Vote Disclosure

The high court's decision is the latest to map out steps corporations need to take when handling a controller-involved transaction.
4 minute read
April 29, 2024 | Delaware Law Weekly

Morris Nichols Partner to Co-Present at 25th Annual PLI Private Equity Forum

The Practising Law Institute (PLI) is scheduled to host the 25th annual Private Equity Forum from Monday to Tuesday and Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell partner Dave Harris is set to serve as faculty and a co-presenter.
2 minute read
Movora, LLC v. Gendreau
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: R. Judson Scaggs, Jr., Grant E. Michl, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kevin M. Downey, R. Kennon Poteat III, Anna K. Tsiotsias, Ilana B. Frier, Williams & Connolly, LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
For defendant: David E. Ross, S. Reiko Rogozen, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew W. Vail, Benjamin J. Bradford, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL; Michael L. Vild, Christopher P. Simon, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: N23C-05-034 MAA CCLD

Court denied judgment on the pleadings for defendants in action to obtain contractual indemnification in business purchase agreement where plaintiffs' interpretation of the scope of the agreement's indemnification provision, including the amount of indemnification, was facially reasonable.

April 24, 2024 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Chancery Urged to Block Tesla 'Run From Jurisdiction' in Elon Musk Pay Case

Tesla has filed a proxy indicating it would be seeking shareholder votes on a relocation to Texas and whether Musk should receive the 2018 compensation plan that had been struck down by the Court of Chancery.
3 minute read
In re Match Group, Inc. Derivative Litig.
Publication Date: 2024-04-15
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael Hanrahan, J. Clayton Athey, Corinne Elise Amato, Kevin H. Davenport, Stacey A. Greenspan, Jason W. Rigby, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, J. Daniel Albert, Maria T. Starling, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA; Robert D. Klausner, Klausner, Kaufman, Jensen & Levinson, Plantation, FL for appellants.
For defendant: William M. Lafferty, John P. DiTomo, Elizabeth A. Mullin, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Theodore N. Mirvis, Jonathan M. Moses, Ryan A. McLeod, Alexandra P. Sadinsky, Canem Ozyildirim, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY; Blake Rohrbacher, Matthew W. Murphy, Sandy Xu, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Maeve O’Connor, Susan R. Gittes, Amy C. Zimmerman, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, NY; David E. Ross, Adam D. Gold, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joshua G. Hamilton, Meryn C.N. Grant, Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Blair Connelly, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Michele D. Johnson, Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA for appellees.
Case number: 368, 2022

Chancery court erroneously applied business judgment rule to review transaction where controlling stockholder stood on both sides and received a non-ratable benefit where not all members of the company's separation committee were independent from the controller.

Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. of Am. v. Blackbaud, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-04-08
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: E-Commerce | Insurance | Non-Profit
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Miller
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Wade A. Adams, Law Offices of Wade A. Adams, III, Newark, DE; Kenneth T. Levine, de Luca Levine LLC, East Norriton, PA; Lisa C. McLaughlin, Todd L. Goodman, Phillips, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
For defendant: John P. DiTomo, Emily C. Friedman, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sarah Fulton Hutchins, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Charlotte, NC; Corri A. Hopkins, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Raleigh, NC for defendant.
Case number: N22C-12-130 KMM

Insurers' subrogation action failed where they failed to identify specific contractual provisions or common law duties of care that were breached by hosting company that suffered a data breach.

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources