0 results for 'Duke University'
Divided Conn. High Court Says Public Policy Violations Not Enough to Vacate Arbitration Award
The majority ruled that in order to vacate an arbitration award, it must violate public policy. But since the criminal charges against the employee, a university administrator, had been dismissed, it could not dislodge the award.
A Novel (and 'Funnier') Ranking System for Law Schools: How Many Mentions in the Times
Alternatives to the U.S. News & World Report Law Schools Rankings have gotten a lot of press lately, and one University of Kentucky law school professor is the latest to offer one: a "funnier" rankings system.
Are Companies Given Deferred-Prosecution Deals Scared Straight? Boeing Odyssey Adds to Doubts
"Stronger compliance is needed to actually fix entrenched misconduct," said Brandon Garrett, author of "Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise With Corporations."
How I Made Partner: 'Consider Your Co-Workers as Clients,' Says Taylor Weinstein of Pryor Cashman
"Having a positive attitude about work assignments is noted and makes partners want to work with you in the future. Ultimately, it will be your partners and peers who will be deciding on your promotion, so you want as many people on your side to advocate for you when the time comes."
Soliman v. Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust Ltd.
Publication Date: 2024-05-22 Practice Area: Consumer Protection |
Technology Media and Telecom
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Judge: Circuit Judge Denny Chin Attorneys: For plaintiff: Todd M. Friedman, Adrian R. Bacon, Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., Woodland Hills, CA.
For Plaintiff-Appellant Marina Soliman: Brenden P. Leydon, Wocl & Leydon, L.L.C., Stamford, CT. For defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust, Ltd: Ian C. Ballon, Lori Chang, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Brian T. Feeney, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Philadelphia, PA. Case number: 22-1726-cv
Telephone Numbers Called by Subway Derived From Preexisting Lists; TCPA Inapplicable
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Chester County Court Rules 2024
Authors:
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Duke University"
The Debate on Data Scraping Was Almost Over—Until Generative AI Rekindled It
Courts have issued several rulings over the last decades on data scraping—and, in most cases, have authorized the practice. But generative AI has allowed scraping to proliferate to levels that experts say are now "unsustainable."
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Runners-up this week include litigators at Cooley, Kramer Levin and Varnum.
Cedeno v. Sasson
Publication Date: 2024-05-09 Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Judge: Circuit Judge Beth Robinson Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee: Rachana A. Pathak, Douglas D. Geyser, John Stokes, Tillman J. Breckenridge, on the brief: Peter K. Stris, Stris & Maher LLP, Los Angeles, CA and Washington, D.C.
As Amicus Curiae in support of Plaintiff-Appellee: Seema Nanda, G. William Scott, Jeffrey M. Hahn, on the brief, Alyssa C. George, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, D.C. For defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Argent Trust Co.: Lars C. Golumbic, Michael J. Prame, Paul J. Rinefierd, on the brief, Sarah M. Adams, Groom Law Group, Chartered, Washington, D.C.
For Defendants-Appellants Ryan Sasson, Daniel Blumkin, Ian Behar, Duke Enterprises LLC, Twist Financial LLC, Blaise Investments LLC, and Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC: Jeremy P. Blumenfeld, Margaret M. McDowell, Jared R. Killeen, Antonia M. Moran, Michael E. Kenneally, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA and Washington, D.C.
Jennifer B. Dickey, U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, Washington, D.C., Andrew J. Pincus, Archis A. Parasharami, Daniel E. Jones, Erica A. White, Nancy G. Ross, Jed W. Glickstein, Washington, D.C. and Chicago, IL.
For Amici Curiae the ESOP Association and the American Benefits Council in support of Defendants-Appellants: Mark D. Taticchi, Elizabeth M. Casey, Richard J. Pearl, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Philadelphia, PA and Chicago, IL. Case number: 21-2891-cv
Arbitration Clause Unenforceable; Would Prevent Pursuit of Plan-Wide Remedies Under ERISA
So You Think Courts Can Handle Questions of AI-Enhanced Evidence?
Hold on to your hats.
Court of Appeals: April 30, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-30 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals, New York State Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Cases & Motions
Trending Stories
- 1AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 2Law.com's Top 100 Verdicts of 2023
- 3In Wake of Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Ex-Law Professor, GMU Bans Intimate Relationships With Students
- 4Joshua Wright Sues GMU for Alleged Title IX Violations, but Has $108M Defamation Suit Against Accusers Tossed
- 5Updated Stanford Report Finds High Hallucination Rates on Westlaw AI
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now