Search Results

0 results for 'Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
December 08, 1999 |

Recent Delaware Cases Spark Debate Over Future of No-Talk Provisions

Are no-talk clauses in stock-for-stock merger agreements dead? Three recent cases from the Delaware Chancery Court appear to allow a board of directors to consider other merger offers even if the board has agreed to a no-talk provision with an initial suitor. No-talk clauses forbid a target's board of directors from engaging in merger discussions with other bidders -- even those presenting bona fide unsolicited offers -- until a shareholder vote occurs on the initial bid.
6 minute read
In re Digex, Inc.
Publication Date: 2001-01-02
Practice Area: corporate &amp | securities
Industry:
Court: Del. Ch. Ct.
Judge: CHANDLER, Chancellor
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: Civil Action No.

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. CHANDLER, Chancellor This is my decision on plaintiffs' motion to preliminarily enjoin the proposed merger between

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT