0 results for 'Microsoft'
US Judge Denies California Writers' Motion to Intervene in SDNY ChatGPT Cases
U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein said intervention, dismissal or transfer would disrupt the timeline laid out for the three authors' cases in New York, which have already begun discovery.
Best Use of Emerging Technology (Non-AI), Law Firm: Reanna Martinez, Munger, Tolles & Olson
"In the legal tech world, you have the opportunity to be a trailblazer, driving change in an industry known for its conventions," said Reanna Martinez, Manager: Innovation, Systems, and Data at Munger, Tolles & Olson.
Flushing Bank v. Cabrera Realty Corp.
Publication Date: 2024-04-02 Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York Judge: Justice Francis A. Kahn III Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 850134/2019
Summary Judgment in Foreclosure Action; Defendant Failed to Give Notice of Second Mortgage
AP-fonden v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-04-01 Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery Judge: Chancellor McCormick Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Hanrahan, Corinne Elise Amato, Kevin H. Davenport, Stacey A. Greenspan, Christine N. Chappelear, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, J. Daniel Albert, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA for plaintiff. For defendant: Edward B. Micheletti, Lauren N. Rosenello, Michelle L. Davis, Peyton V. Carper, Claire K. Atwood, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE; Elena C. Norman, Daniel M. Kirshenbaum, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stephen P. Blake, Laura Lin, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Sareen K. Armani, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants. Case number: 2022-1001-KSJM
Although the Delaware General Corporation Law only required a corporate board to approve and recommend an essentially complete version of a merger agreement, the draft version approved by defendants failed to meet this standard by omitting key terms and ancillary documents repeatedly referenced throughout the agreement.
Crosby JMW LLC v. 138th St. Apts. LLC
Publication Date: 2024-04-01 Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York Judge: Justice Lynn R. Kotler Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 154099/2022
Court Finds Respondent Entitled to Recover Unpaid Attorney and Licensing Fees
Gespa Nicaragua, S.A. v. Recom AG
Publication Date: 2024-04-01 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals Judge: Justice Palafox Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 08-22-00244-CV
In a complex legal dispute involving appellant Gespa Nicaragua, S.A. (Gespa) and appellees Flextronics International USA, Inc., Flextronics Automotive USA (Texas), LLC, collectively, Flextronics, Recom AG, and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., the court addressed multiple issues stemming from a contract for the purchase of solar panels for a project in Nicaragua.
Generative AI and E-Discovery: 6 Lessons From the Past Year
During Friday's "An E-Discovery AI Primer on Distinguishing Machine Learning from ChatGPT and Other Tools" webinar from ACEDS, panelists looked back at some of the lessons from the past year or so since generative AI was first introduced to the legal profession.
Education in the Age of Gen AI: Experiential Training Is Essential for Success
Generative AI's ultimate impact on the delivery of legal services is already in motion. To meet it, the legal industry must embrace practical training now, which will not only be driven by AI, but also extend to AI itself.
Legal Tech Rundown: Opus 2 Updates, Haystack ID M365 Launch—and More
An update on the legal tech market's past few weeks, from product launches to new partnerships.
Acevedo v. Citibank, N.A.
Publication Date: 2024-03-29 Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Bronx Judge: Justice Veronica G. Hummel Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 802892/2021E
Article 52 Proceedings Not Exclusive Means of Relief for EIPA Violations, Court Holds
TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now