Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Sun Microsystems, Inc.'

You can use to get even better search results
June 25, 1999 |

Microsoft Trial Testimony Ends

Testimony ended Thursday on the 76th day of the landmark Microsoft antitrust trial, a courtroom drama that offered a look at the nation's booming high-tech industry and the software giant that dominates it. The trial's final witness, Richard Schmalensee of MIT, argued that the $14 billion company isn't the entrenched monopolist that illegally wields extraordinary influence. But in what became routine during the trial, the company's witness was challenged again Thursday in a piercing cross-examination.
2 minute read
Sizing Up the Lawyers After Week One of Oracle v. Google
Publication Date: 2012-04-22
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Each side in the showdown over Android is relying on a small army of lawyers to make its case, and their roles became clearer as the first week of trial wrapped up in Judge William Alsup's San Francisco courtroom.

Patrick Flint, Plaintiff v. Tucker Printers, Inc., A Divisions of Consolidated Graphics, Inc., Defendant, 09-CV-6083
Publication Date: 2011-01-18
Practice Area: Employment
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Western District
Judge: District Judge Michael A. Telesca
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09-CV-6083

Cite as: Flint v. Tucker Printers, Inc., 09-CV-6083, NYLJ 1202478142270, at *1 (WDNY, Decided January 7, 2010)District Judge Michael A. Telescap class="dec

Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc.
Publication Date: 1999-12-03
Practice Area: class actions | securities litigation
Industry:
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Judge: Myron H. Bright, Stephen Reinhardt, and Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Timothy A. Shimko
For defendant: Neil Goteiner
Case number: No. 99-55227

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. TROTT, Circuit Judge: EPL Prolong, Inc., et al. (collectively "Appellants" ) appeal an order of th

November 23, 2010 |

Discovery Names Bruce Campbell General Counsel

Discovery Communications, the folks who brought you The Crocodile Hunter and Jon & Kate Plus 8, can boast another addition to the company's lineup, this time in the legal department: Bruce Campbell, its new chief development officer and general counsel.
3 minute read
March 18, 2002 |

Antitrust Trade and Practice

W hether antitrust neophytes or competition law Brahmins, we always look forward to the annual meeting of the New York State Bar Association Antitrust Section held every January of the new year. In addition to the excellent daytime programs, the highlight of the meeting is, without doubt, the presentation by the section`s guest dinner speaker from inside the beltway. Over the last 28 years the assemblage has heard from Department of Justice (DOJ) Assistant and Deputy Attorneys General, Federal Trade Commiss
11 minute read
March 01, 2008 |

Hard Lessons

Even if Qualcomm's e-discovery blunders were innocent, they were costly-and avoidable. Here's how other law departments can do better.
13 minute read
March 02, 2005 |

Maxing Out

For a corporation to successfully leverage its intellectual property, the company's chief executive needs to get with the program. That's one lesson learned at an IP Law & Business roundtable where lawyers, executives and consultants convened to discuss how to best maximize a patent portfolio's value. The discussion stayed friendly until the question of who should take the lead on IP strategy came up.
15 minute read
February 08, 2005 |

Computer Law

Richard Raysman and Peter Brown, partners at Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner, write that, over the past year, there has been a growing use of open-source software in corporate environments and they discuss some of the issues that have begun to emerge as a result of that use.
9 minute read
Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.
Publication Date: 2001-10-22
Practice Area: unfair business practices
Industry:
Court: 3rd Cir.
Judge: Scirica, Circuit Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 00-2373

Argued April 5, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTIn this Lanham Act case, plaintiff Checkpoint Systems, Inc. alleges Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. infringed on its trademark and engaged in unfa

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT