Search Results

0 results for 'The Cochran'

You can use to get even better search results
Raffensperger v. Jackson et al.
Publication Date: 2023-06-21
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Health Care Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Chief Justice Boggs
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Ross Warren Bergethon, Maximillian James Changus, Margaret Kemmerly Eckrote, Christopher M. Carr, Stephen John Petrany, (Department of Law), Atlanta, Melissa Angeleah Tracy, (Jarrard & Davis, LLP), Cumming, for appellant.
For defendant: Yasha Heidari, (Heidari Power Law Group, LLC), Atlanta, Renee D. Flaherty, (Institute for Justice), Arlington, Jaimie Cavanaugh, (Institute for Justice), Minneapolis, for appellee; Amy Lee Copeland, (Rouse & Copeland, LLC), Savannah, for Amicus Appellant; Anthony L. Cochran, Emma Cramer, (Smith, Gambrell & Russell), Atlanta, for Neutral Amicus; Maxwell Kent Thelen, (Ashby Thelen Lowry), Marietta, Eugene R. Curry, (Law Office of Eugene R. Curry), Barnstable, Joseph Diedrich, (Husch Blackwell LLP), Madison, Rebecca C. Furdek, (Husch Blackwell LLLP), Milwaukee, Abraham James Spung, (Husch Blackwell LLP), Chattanooga, Glenn A. Delk, (Lightmas & Delk), Atlanta, Wilson C. Freeman, (Pacific Legal Foundation.), Sacramento, Timothy Sandefur, (Scharf-Norton Center For Constitutional Litigation), Phoenix, Madison Hunter Kitchens, John Franklin Sacha, Jr., Seth Isaac Euster, (King & Spalding LLP), Atlanta, for Amicus Appellee.
Case number: S23A0017

Statute Requiring Certification of Lactation Care Providers Violated Due Process Right to Practice Their Chosen Profession

June 20, 2023 | Law.com

Success of Online JD Programs Varies by Demographic, Says New AccessLex, Gallup Report

The AccessLex Institute and Gallup released Tuesday indicates that part-time students, caregivers, students ages 30 and older and those attending tier-four (T4) ranked law schools were most receptive to online J.D. courses and reported more favorable experiences compared to their counterparts.
6 minute read
Kellum v. The State
Publication Date: 2023-06-16
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Markle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Sherry Widner, (Georgia Public Defenders Council, Pataula Public Defenders Office), Donalsonville, for appellant.
For defendant: Ronald McNease, (District Attorney, Pataula Judicial Circuit), Cuthbert, for appellee.
Case number: A23A0482

Court affirms defendant's new sentence after his probation was revoked in relation to certain drug charges and vacates certain language referring to credit for time served

June 12, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Best Law Firm Mentors 2023: Matthew Johnson

Matthew Johnson's guiding influence starts in Pittsburgh, with the diverse practice group he has grown in Pennsylvania, and extends throughout the firm to Cleveland, California, and even so far as Taiwan.
4 minute read
Early v. Morgan Fleet Services, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-06-09
Practice Area: Expert Witnesses
Industry: Transportation
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Land
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Sidney Moore, (The Moore Law Firm, P.C.), Atlanta, Samuel Starks, Shean Williams, (The Cochran Firm Atlanta), Atlanta, Andre’ Ramsay, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: George Welborn, (Downey, Cleveland, Parker & Williams), Marietta, for appellee.
Case number: A23A0148

Court reverses summary judgment and rules that an expert's opinion is admissible in a negligence matter even though the opinion is not based on a hard scientific basis

Galderma Labs. L.P. v. Lupin Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-06-06
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bibas
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Jeremy A. Tigan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew J. Cochran, Gerald J. Flattman, Jr., Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Megan C. Haney, John C. Phillips, Jr., Phillips, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Adrianne C. Rose, Joseph T. Jaros, Natasha L. White, William A. Rakoczy, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.
Case number: 21-cv-1710-SB

Court could clarify claim constructions from prior litigation involving the same patents-in-suit even if patentee acted as its own lexicographer, but only narrow clarification was necessary for one of the disputed terms.

June 01, 2023 | New York Law Journal

Challenging Agency Power: 'Axon,' Part 2

In Axon Enterprise v. F.T.C., the U.S. Supreme Court very recently decreed that constitutional challenges to regulatory power need not be relegated to agency administrative law judges, but rather are cognizable in the district courts. In the first installment of his two-part series, Anthony Sabino discussed the foundation for this newest edict. Now he turns to Axon itself.
9 minute read
May 30, 2023 | Daily Report Online

Constitutional Attacks Mount Against Fed Agency Proceedings in Wake of High Court Decision Involving Ga. Case

With the first post-Axon challenge already underway in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and a pending petition for writ of certiorari from a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision declaring the SEC's administrative proceedings unconstitutional, we may soon see whether and how these judicial constraints on administrative proceedings will continue to develop in the aftermath of Axon.
10 minute read
May 26, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Constitutional Attacks Mount Against Federal Agency Proceedings in Wake of High Court Decision

With the first post-Axon challenge already underway in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and a pending petition for writ of certiorari from a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision declaring the SEC's administrative proceedings unconstitutional, we may soon see whether and how these judicial constraints on administrative proceedings will continue to develop in the aftermath of Axon.
10 minute read
May 17, 2023 | New York Law Journal

Is the Administrative State Locked Into a Death Spiral? The Impact of 'Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC'

In his Corporate Securities column, Professor John Coffee discusses the impact of Axon Enter. v. FTC, which he writes "masks a lack of consensus and shows the court to be straddling—at least for the time—a deep division over whether administrative agencies can utilize administrative law judges."
11 minute read

Resources