0 results for ''Fish & Richardson''
Fish & Richardson Enters Patent Dispute Over GPS System
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the document here.
Early Reports: 2023 Am Law 200 Financials
A collection of The American Lawyer's reporting on how law firms fared in 2022.
Zuckerbrot v. Lande
Publication Date: 2023-04-12 Practice Area: Discovery
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York Judge: Justice Joel M. Cohen Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 655110/2020
Court Gives Defendant Final Chance to Comply With Discovery or Risk Significant Sanctions
Iacovacci v. Brevet Holdings LLC
Publication Date: 2023-03-30 Practice Area: Discovery
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York Judge: Justice Alexander M. Tisch Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 158735/2016
Plaintiff Establishes That Defendants' Withholding of Requested Documents Is Willful
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
America Invents Act (AIA) Handbook: A Guide to the Patent Law Reform of 2011, The, 2015 Edition
Authors: Mary Anthony Merchant
View this Book
View more book results for the query "'Fish & Richardson'"
Exeltis USA Inc. v. Lupin Ltd.
Publication Date: 2023-03-21 Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Andrews Attorneys: For plaintiff: Martina T. Hufnal, Douglas E. McCann, Gregory R. Booker, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Brian Coggio, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY; Megan A. Chacon, Bernard Cryan, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA for plaintiffs. For defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr., David A. Bilson, Phillips Mclaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Michael Nutter, McGuireWoods LLP, Chicago, IL; Merritt Westcott, McGuireWoods LLP, Houston, TX; Corinne S. Hockman, McGuireWoods LLP, Raleigh, NC for defendants. Case number: 22-434-RGA
Patentees created their own definition for the term "about," but defined it in such a way as to make the term indefinite since it effectively created an unbounded value range for the claim.
Appellate Division, First Department: March 9, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-03-09 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:March 7, 2023
Quinn Emanuel Defends Cribl in Patent Dispute With Splunk
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
InQuisient Inc. v. ServiceNow, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-03-07 Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce |
Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Burke Attorneys: For plaintiff: Susan E. Morrison, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Frank E. Scherkenbach, Adam Kessel, Andrew Pearson, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA; Jason W. Wolff, Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA; Excylyn Hardin-Smith, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY for plaintiff. For defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kevin P.B. Johnson, Diane M. Doolittle, Ray Zado, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA; Marissa R. Ducca, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jodie Cheng, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant. Case number: 22-900-CJB
Court declined to dismiss patent infringement case at pleadings stage due to lack of patent-eligible subject matter where patent claims appeared to describe new method of electronic data management solving existing problems of flexibility and portability between databases, which constituted an inventive concept beyond the abstract idea of managing data.
Persawvere v. Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-03-07 Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Consumer Products |
Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Williams Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly Allenspach Del Dotto, Susan E. Morrison, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Kurt L. Glitzenstein, Jacob B. Pecht, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA for plaintiff. For defendant: Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jason C. White, Scott D. Sherwin, Maria E. Doukas, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant. Case number: 21-400-GBW
Court declined to adopt limited construction of patent terms based on prosecution history where inventor had merely clarified patent to distinguish invention from prior art.
Trending Stories
- 1AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 2Joshua Wright's $108M Defamation Case Against Former Students to Proceed to Trial
- 3The Hype Behind Harvey: How the Stealthy Startup Is Raising Industry Eyebrows
- 4'Misses the Forest for the Trees': Barrett Knocks Thomas' Use of History
- 5Skadden Hires First Chief People Officer as More Law Firms Take Holistic Approach to Talent
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now